Re: [Gluster-devel] gNFS service management from glusterd

2018-02-23 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 08:25:21PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 4:24 PM, Xavi Hernandez > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > currently glusterd sends a SIGKILL to stop gNFS, while all other > services > > > are

Re: [Gluster-devel] gNFS service management from glusterd

2018-02-23 Thread Niels de Vos
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 08:25:21PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 4:24 PM, Xavi Hernandez wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > currently glusterd sends a SIGKILL to stop gNFS, while all other services > > are stopped with a SIGTERM signal first (this can be seen in > > glusterd_sv

Re: [Gluster-devel] gNFS service management from glusterd

2018-02-21 Thread Atin Mukherjee
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 4:24 PM, Xavi Hernandez wrote: > Hi all, > > currently glusterd sends a SIGKILL to stop gNFS, while all other services > are stopped with a SIGTERM signal first (this can be seen in > glusterd_svc_stop() function of mgmt/glusterd xlator). > > The question is why it cannot

[Gluster-devel] gNFS service management from glusterd

2018-02-21 Thread Xavi Hernandez
Hi all, currently glusterd sends a SIGKILL to stop gNFS, while all other services are stopped with a SIGTERM signal first (this can be seen in glusterd_svc_stop() function of mgmt/glusterd xlator). The question is why it cannot be stopped with SIGTERM as all other services. Using SIGKILL blindly