Re: [Gluster-devel] regression burn-in summary over the last 7 days

2016-08-04 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > I think we should compare n-1th week report with nth and any common tests > out of that comparison having more than or equal to 3 instances of failures > SHOULD immediately marked as bad and any component having more than 5 bad > tests should

Re: [Gluster-devel] regression burn-in summary over the last 7 days

2016-08-04 Thread Milind Changire
On 08/04/2016 05:40 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote: On 08/04/2016 08:07 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:00:53AM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:30:28AM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: ... ./tests/bugs/gfapi/bug-1093594.t ; Failed 1 times Regression Links

Re: [Gluster-devel] regression burn-in summary over the last 7 days

2016-08-04 Thread Kaleb KEITHLEY
On 08/04/2016 08:07 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:00:53AM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:30:28AM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> > ... >>> ./tests/bugs/gfapi/bug-1093594.t ; Failed 1 times >>> Regression Links: >>> https://build.gluster.org/jo

Re: [Gluster-devel] regression burn-in summary over the last 7 days

2016-08-04 Thread Niels de Vos
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:00:53AM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:30:28AM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: > ... > > ./tests/bugs/gfapi/bug-1093594.t ; Failed 1 times > > Regression Links: > > https://build.gluster.org/job/regression-test-burn-in/1423/consoleFull > > I

Re: [Gluster-devel] regression burn-in summary over the last 7 days

2016-08-03 Thread Atin Mukherjee
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > >> [Thanks to Jeff Darcy, Poornima G and Raghavendra Talur for >> extras/failed-tests.py which generates this summary] >> >> Found cores: >> >> Component: [u'glusterfs-1879.core'

Re: [Gluster-devel] regression burn-in summary over the last 7 days

2016-08-03 Thread Niels de Vos
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:30:28AM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: > ./tests/basic/gfapi/bug1291259.t ; Failed 1 times > Regression Links: > https://build.gluster.org/job/regression-test-burn-in/1450/consoleFull I'm modifying this test for a cleanup in gfapi+upcall and found a problem with it

Re: [Gluster-devel] regression burn-in summary over the last 7 days

2016-08-03 Thread Atin Mukherjee
I think we should compare n-1th week report with nth and any common tests out of that comparison having more than or equal to 3 instances of failures SHOULD immediately marked as bad and any component having more than 5 bad tests should be BLOCKED for further merges till bad tests are fixed. What d

Re: [Gluster-devel] regression burn-in summary over the last 7 days

2016-08-03 Thread Atin Mukherjee
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > [Thanks to Jeff Darcy, Poornima G and Raghavendra Talur for > extras/failed-tests.py which generates this summary] > > Found cores: > > Component: [u'glusterfs-1879.core'] > Regression Link: > https://build.gluster.org/job/regression-t

[Gluster-devel] regression burn-in summary over the last 7 days

2016-08-03 Thread Vijay Bellur
[Thanks to Jeff Darcy, Poornima G and Raghavendra Talur for extras/failed-tests.py which generates this summary] Found cores: Component: [u'glusterfs-1879.core'] Regression Link: https://build.gluster.org/job/regression-test-burn-in/1451/consoleFull ./tests/performance/open-behind.t