On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>> Thank you Kaleb. Shall we start somwhere in terms of automation?
>>
>> The cppcheck results look the shortest[1]. If we can commit to fixing all of
>> them in the next 1 month, I can kick off a non-voting smoke job. We'll make
>> it
>> vote af
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 01:06:35PM -0500, Jeff Darcy wrote:
> Before we get to automation, shouldn't we have a discussion about what
> "defects" we should filter out? For example, we already have a problem
> with compilers spitting out warnings about unused variables in generated
> code, and then
> [xlators/experimental/fdl/src/dump-tmpl.c] ->
> [xlators/experimental/fdl/src/dump-tmpl.c]: (error) syntax error
> [xlators/experimental/fdl/src/recon-tmpl.c] ->
> [xlators/experimental/fdl/src/recon-tmpl.c]: (error) syntax error
> [xlators/experimental/jbr-client/src/fop-template.c] ->
> [xlator
On 12/19/2016 01:06 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>> Thank you Kaleb. Shall we start somwhere in terms of automation?
>>
>> The cppcheck results look the shortest[1]. If we can commit to fixing all of
>> them in the next 1 month, I can kick off a non-voting smoke job. We'll make
>> it
>> vote after 1 month
> Thank you Kaleb. Shall we start somwhere in terms of automation?
>
> The cppcheck results look the shortest[1]. If we can commit to fixing all of
> them in the next 1 month, I can kick off a non-voting smoke job. We'll make
> it
> vote after 1 month. I guss the cli and experimental xlator (and a
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:56:27PM -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 12/19/2016 12:49 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> > Thank you Kaleb. Shall we start somwhere in terms of automation?
> >
> > The cppcheck results look the shortest[1]. If we can commit to fixing all of
> > them in the next 1 month, I ca
On 12/19/2016 12:56 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 12/19/2016 12:49 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
>> Thank you Kaleb. Shall we start somwhere in terms of automation?
>>
>> The cppcheck results look the shortest[1]. If we can commit to fixing all of
>> them in the next 1 month, I can kick off a non-votin
On 12/19/2016 12:49 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> Thank you Kaleb. Shall we start somwhere in terms of automation?
>
> The cppcheck results look the shortest[1]. If we can commit to fixing all of
> them in the next 1 month, I can kick off a non-voting smoke job. We'll make it
> vote after 1 month. I gue
Thank you Kaleb. Shall we start somwhere in terms of automation?
The cppcheck results look the shortest[1]. If we can commit to fixing all of
them in the next 1 month, I can kick off a non-voting smoke job. We'll make it
vote after 1 month. I guss the cli and experimental xlator (and a few more
xl
Hi,
Nightly runs of static analyzers have been migrated to a new host
(inside Red Hat) running Fedora 25. (The old host was running F23.)
With that update comes clang-3.8 (from 3.7) and cppcheck-1.75 (from 1.70).
Independent of that, coverity was updated from 7.7.0 to 8.6.0.
As always the resul
10 matches
Mail list logo
