Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression tests: reviews required

2014-11-30 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com wrote: And as the fix crop, I have a few others to share :-) More the merrier :-). Here is the latest list of NetBSD fixes for regression tests: http://review.gluster.com/8982 http://review.gluster.com/9071 http://review.gluster.com/9075

[Gluster-devel] Fio (ioengine=gfapi) FS_cached_4k_random_reads fails on gluster v3.6.1

2014-11-30 Thread Kiran Patil
I am running fio (https://github.com/axboe/fio) latest from master branch with below configuration on gluster v3.6.1 CentOS v6.6 and it is failing. I have raised issue at bugzilla id=1169236. # fio $args --output=4k_caranred_gz.log --section=FS_cached_4k_random_reads --ioengine=gfapi

Re: [Gluster-devel] Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for GlusterFS

2014-11-30 Thread Vijay Bellur
Hi All, Shall we set a goal for ourselves to be Coverity Scan clean by GlusterFS 3.7? I think fixing problems reported in the incremental reports here would be a good way of keeping the number of static analysis defects in control. It would be great if developers who checked in code

Re: [Gluster-devel] Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for GlusterFS

2014-11-30 Thread Atin Mukherjee
On 12/01/2014 12:31 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: Hi All, Shall we set a goal for ourselves to be Coverity Scan clean by GlusterFS 3.7? I think fixing problems reported in the incremental reports here would be a good way of keeping the number of static analysis defects in control. It would