Re: [Gluster-devel] What does it mean (unify bug ?) ?

2008-06-14 Thread Amar S. Tumballi
Hi Anton, This bug is fixed in patch-780. It is related to rename. Regards, Amar On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Антон Халиков <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello. It's me again. > > >Hi Anton, your volume spec looks fine. Please upgrade to 1.3.9 > > > I've upgraded to 1.3.9. Then I recreated a

Re: [Gluster-devel] LVM

2008-06-14 Thread Anand Babu Periasamy
Towards end of this year, we will be introducing snapshot, hsm, dedup ... as GlusterFS translators. It is better to wait for that one. Until then, Amanda like backup solution over mounted GlusterFS volume is a better approach. -- Anand Babu Periasamy GPG Key ID: 0x62E15A31 Blog [http://ab.freesh

[Gluster-devel] Re: cp taking 100% cpu and never terminating

2008-06-14 Thread Mickey Mazarick
I'm still seeing the problem described below. It only happens over the ibverbs transport and very infrequently tcp. This is an intermittent problem, but happens quite frequently over ibverbs. It will use all the processing power on a single core of the client machine. I can repeat the command b

Re: [Gluster-devel] LVM

2008-06-14 Thread Onyx
Krishna Srinivas wrote: Onyx, Just thinking about it, using snapshots as glusterfs storage volumes is not advisable unless you know what you are doing. If you roll back a volume, it will depend on how selfheal of unify/afr handle it. AFR would just update the rolled back volume with the other co

Re: [Gluster-devel] LVM

2008-06-14 Thread Krishna Srinivas
Onyx, Just thinking about it, using snapshots as glusterfs storage volumes is not advisable unless you know what you are doing. If you roll back a volume, it will depend on how selfheal of unify/afr handle it. AFR would just update the rolled back volume with the other copy. Better use of LVM + gl

Re: [Gluster-devel] LVM

2008-06-14 Thread Gordan Bobic
Assuming the underlying FS itself is consistent (which is by no means guaranteed in snapshotting!), the out of data volume would eventually get up to date through use. Gordan Onyx wrote: Hmm, yes, what was I thinking But if I want to use LVM snapshots underneath glusterfs volumes (on di

Re: [Gluster-devel] LVM

2008-06-14 Thread Onyx
Hmm, yes, what was I thinking But if I want to use LVM snapshots underneath glusterfs volumes (on different bricks) who are then unified or afr'd, won't there be a problem because the snapshots aren't taken at exactly the same time? Or what would be the expected behavior if I for example

Re: [Gluster-devel] LVM

2008-06-14 Thread Anand Babu Periasamy
-- Anand Babu Periasamy GPG Key ID: 0x62E15A31 Blog [http://ab.freeshell.org] The GNU Operating System [http://www.gnu.org] Z RESEARCH Inc [http://www.zresearch.com] Hi Onyx, GlusterFS volumes are file based. LVM requires block based store. You cannot have LVM over GlusterFS. I am assuming you a