Hi Yaomin,
Yep, reiserFS also supports a huge number of subdirectories, something
like 2 million, I think.
Regards,
Ananth
-Original Message-
From: yaomin @ gmail
To: ana...@zresearch.com
Cc: gluster-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Re: Gluster-devel Digest, Vol 41, Issue 13
Ananth,
Thank you for your kindness.
I will try to use them as you advise. For past days, I have research the
ReiserFS, about which some papers said it is no limitation on the number of the
subdirectory, is it right?
Thanks,
Yaomin
From: Ananth
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 2:47 PM
Hi Yaomin,
>From what I remember both XFS and the rather nascent EXT4 have a higher
subdirectory limit. You could probably check ZFS as well.
You can convert your ext3 filesystem into ext4 :
http://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Ext4_Howto#Converting_an_ext3_filesystem_to_ext4
These are just poi
Melvin,
Patch 841 fixes the issue.
Regards
Krishna
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Melvin Wong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do anyone know what these logs mean?
>
>
>
> 2009-01-09 13:30:35 E [ha.c:4301:notify] glusterfs-ha: GF_EVENT_CHILD_UP
> from cluster
>
> 2009-01-09 13:30:35 E [ha.c:4310:notify] gluste
Hi,
Do anyone know what these logs mean?
2009-01-09 13:30:35 E [ha.c:4301:notify] glusterfs-ha: GF_EVENT_CHILD_UP
from cluster
2009-01-09 13:30:35 E [ha.c:4310:notify] glusterfs-ha: switching
"active" from -1 to cluster
2009-01-09 13:30:35 E [ha.c:4301:notify] glusterfs-ha: GF_EVENT_CHILD_U
Dear All,
I am benchmarking GlusterFS against NFS . I have tested only one server and
one client with GlusterFS .I am planing to set up 4 server and one client
.currently i am using glusterfs 1.3.8 rpm for testing . I would like use
latest GlusterFS 1.4 for testing .because some one telling 1.3.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Daniel Maher wrote:
> Krishna Srinivas wrote:
>
>>
>> HA is also useful when we use server side AFRs.
>>
>
> This statement is highly interesting. Would it be possible to have more
> information on how the HA translator could be intelligently implemented in a
> ser
On Jan 8, 2009, at 5:23 AM, Joe Landman wrote:
Dan Parsons wrote:
Now that I'm upgrading to gluster 1.4/2.0, I'm going to take the time
and rearchitect things.
Hardware: Gluster servers: 4 blades connected via 4gbit fc to fast,
dedicated storage. Each server has two bonded Gig-E links to the r
Lukas,
We have the fix in source code archive.
ftp://ftp.zresearch.com/pub/gluster/glusterfs/1.4/glusterfs-1.4.0rc7.tar.gzhas
the fix and is the latest rc release.
--
gowda
2009/1/8 Lukas Hejtmanek
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 04:48:52AM +0530, Basavanagowda Kanur wrote:
> > We have
Dan Parsons wrote:
Now that I'm upgrading to gluster 1.4/2.0, I'm going to take the time
and rearchitect things.
Hardware: Gluster servers: 4 blades connected via 4gbit fc to fast,
dedicated storage. Each server has two bonded Gig-E links to the rest
of my network, for 8gbit/s theoretical throug
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 04:48:52AM +0530, Basavanagowda Kanur wrote:
> We have found the cause for unusual memory usage with io-cache. We are
> working on the fix and will let you know by mail as soon as the fix is
> committed.
is something new here?
--
Lukáš Hejtmánek
__
Krishna Srinivas wrote:
HA is also useful when we use server side AFRs.
This statement is highly interesting. Would it be possible to have more
information on how the HA translator could be intelligently implemented
in a server-side AFR setup, and what the benefits / drawbacks (if any)
w
Melvin,
Just fixed it in patch-841.
Thanks!
Krishna
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Melvin Wong wrote:
> Hi Krishna,
> I am getting this error "Transport endpoint is not connected" on one of
> my clients when I try to use the configuration below. Any ideas what
> could have gone wrong? Thank you.
Dan,
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Dan Parsons wrote:
> Now that I'm upgrading to gluster 1.4/2.0, I'm going to take the time and
> rearchitect things.
>
> Hardware:
> Gluster servers:
> 4 blades connected via 4gbit fc to fast, dedicated storage. Each server has
> two bonded Gig-E links to th
Hi Krishna,
I am getting this error "Transport endpoint is not connected" on one of
my clients when I try to use the configuration below. Any ideas what
could have gone wrong? Thank you.
1: #
2: ## GlusterFS Client Volume Specification ##
3: ###
Now that I'm upgrading to gluster 1.4/2.0, I'm going to take the time and
rearchitect things.
Hardware:
Gluster servers:
4 blades connected via 4gbit fc to fast, dedicated storage. Each server has two
bonded Gig-E links to the rest of my network, for 8gbit/s theoretical
throughput.
Gluster cli
16 matches
Mail list logo
