I'm working on a hadoop/gluster integration. First, whoever wrote the initial
map/reduce gluster DFS layer did a great job. Same with the FUSE layer-- FUSE
alone solves a lot of problems.
However, some of the hadoop architectures require cross language (java)
bindings with gluster (c). Other
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 05:01:10PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 05:10:02PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 05:20:52PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > Telldir() and seekdir() are basically implementation horrors for any
> > > file system that is us
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:37 PM, krish wrote:
> The strategy is to defer yield'ing of the task till a mgmt operation is
> sent to all the peers.
>
> If I understand it right, the following theorem is true,
> - A function which begins execution in a synctask (ie. thread from
> syncenv's thread po
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 05:10:02PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 05:20:52PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > Telldir() and seekdir() are basically implementation horrors for any
> > file system that is using anything other than a simple array of
> > directory entries ala the V
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 04:05:01PM -0800, Anand Avati wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> >
> > I suspect this would seriously screw over Gluster, though, and this
> > wouldn't be a solution for NFSv3, since NFS needs long-lived directory
> > cookies, and not the short
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:44:30PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:05:11PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >
> > Would it be possible to make something work like, for example, a 31-bit
> > hash plus an offset into a hash bucket?
> >
> > I have trouble thinking about this,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 05:20:52PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Telldir() and seekdir() are basically implementation horrors for any
> file system that is using anything other than a simple array of
> directory entries ala the V7 Unix file system or the BSD FFS. For any
> file system which is usi
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:59:17AM +, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: J. Bruce Fields [mailto:bfie...@fieldses.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 4:34 PM
> > To: Myklebust, Trond
> > Cc: Theodore Ts'o; linux-e...@vger.kernel.org; sand...@redhat.com;
> >
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 04:40:35PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> >The general advise (even before this Bug) is that XFS should be used,
> >which is not affected with this problem (yet?).
>
> Hmm, well, always depends on the workload.
XFS won't suffer from this collision bug, for 2 reasons. The f
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:47:20PM -0500, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
> How about "marking" a volume as deleted by setting an
> extended attribute on the /var/lib/glusterd/vols/
> directory, effectively making glusterd perform the following actions for
> deleting a volume:
>
> a. Setting the extende
More reports on 3.4.0alpha
I had a glusterfsd crash on GF_FREE (iosstat->filename). The memory
referenced is still valid, and looking at the code I do not see any
room for double free or free from static storage. I suspect an
unrelated heap corruption.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentat
After working for a few hours, I have glusterd wrecking itslef
on a node. I already reported that for 3.4.0qa8, but at that time
it happened only on an amd64 machine, while now I get it on an i386.
Kernel trace shows no activity from glusterd. Attaching it with
gdb raise a pthrerad related asserti
12 matches
Mail list logo
