On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 06:30:47AM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote:
> On 06/17/2013 02:39 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:07:51PM -0700, Anand Avati wrote:
> >>On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Anand Avati wrote:
>
On 06/17/2013 02:39 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:07:51PM -0700, Anand Avati wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Anand Avati wrote:
This looks more like a compile time feature check than runtime. The
PKG_CONFIG() a
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 04:08:42PM +0530, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> On 06/17/2013 02:39 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:07:51PM -0700, Anand Avati wrote:
> >>On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Anand Avati wrote:
> T
On 06/17/2013 02:39 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:07:51PM -0700, Anand Avati wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Anand Avati wrote:
This looks more like a compile time feature check than runtime. The
PKG_CONFIG() a
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:07:51PM -0700, Anand Avati wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Anand Avati wrote:
> > > This looks more like a compile time feature check than runtime. The
> > > PKG_CONFIG() api number which had the initi