Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal for 3.5: Make adding custom translators easy

Here are some more points to consider: * gluster-devel package should include all the necessary header and library files to compile a standalone glusterfs translator. * /usr/share/doc/gluster-devel/examples/translators/hello-world should contain skeleton translator code (well commented), READM

Re: [Gluster-devel] Proxmox VE 3.1 beta includes Gluster 3.4 plugin

Awesome sauce :) I've asked them if they have anything to post on the Gluster forge. -JM - Original Message - > Just saw this mentioned on Twitter. :) > > Promox 3.1 beta includes a brand new GlusterFS 3.4 storage plugin: > > http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/15433-Proxmox-VE-3-1-be

[Gluster-devel] Proxmox VE 3.1 beta includes Gluster 3.4 plugin

Just saw this mentioned on Twitter. :) Promox 3.1 beta includes a brand new GlusterFS 3.4 storage plugin: http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/15433-Proxmox-VE-3-1-beta-%28pvetest%29 Cool. ;) + Justin -- Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat twitter.com/realjustinclift _

Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal for Gluster 3.5: Better peer identification

On 14/08/2013, at 9:10 AM, Anand Avati wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Kaushal M wrote: > We recently had a mailing list discussion about the current problems > with peer identification and handling multiple networks. This proposal > is regarding better identification of peers. Create

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS 3.5 planning

On 07/24/2013 11:00 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: Hi All, We are considering a 4 month release cycle for GlusterFS 3.5. The tentative dates are as under: 14th Aug, 2013 - Feature proposal freeze Owing to requests, the feature proposal freeze has been moved to 16th Aug, 2013. -Vijay 4th Oct,

Re: [Gluster-devel] QEMU (and other libgfapi client?) crashes on add-brick / replace-brick

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Guido De Rosa wrote: > Well, there's another problem, possibly related, that I didn't notice: I'm > unable to mount! > > (Although libgfapi is meant to bypass fuse-mount, I've read that you need > FUSE working in the same machine where you issue a replace-brick com

Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal for 3.5: Make adding custom translators easy

On 12/08/2013, at 6:52 PM, Justin Clift wrote: > For 3.5, I'd like to propose we add a way for people to easily > add custom translators they've written. (using C, or Glupy, > or whatever) Added this initial proposal to the 3.5 planning page: http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/in

Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal for Gluster 3.5: New test framework

On 14/08/2013, at 5:30 PM, John Mark Walker wrote: > Justin & Avati - have you looked into how OpenStack does automated testing? Yeah. There are two projects I'm aware of for the OpenStack testing. The main official OpenStack one is called Tempest: https://github.com/openstack/tempest It's n

Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal for Gluster 3.5: New test framework

Justin & Avati - have you looked into how OpenStack does automated testing? -JM - Original Message - > On 14/08/2013, at 7:43 AM, Anand Avati wrote: > > Justin, > > > > Thanks for firing up this thread. Are there notable projects which use > > these frameworks? > > Autotest is used by

Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal for Gluster 3.5: New test framework

On 08/14/2013 06:06 PM, Justin Clift wrote: On 14/08/2013, at 7:43 AM, Anand Avati wrote: Justin, Thanks for firing up this thread. Are there notable projects which use these frameworks? Autotest is used by the Linux kernel (its main claim to fame), and is also used by KVM. STAF seems to hav

Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal for Gluster 3.5: New test framework

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Justin Clift wrote: > On 14/08/2013, at 7:43 AM, Anand Avati wrote: > > Justin, > > > > Thanks for firing up this thread. Are there notable projects which use > these frameworks? > > Autotest is used by the Linux kernel (its main claim to > fame), and is also used

Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal for Gluster 3.5: New test framework

On 14/08/2013, at 7:43 AM, Anand Avati wrote: > Justin, > > Thanks for firing up this thread. Are there notable projects which use these > frameworks? Autotest is used by the Linux kernel (its main claim to fame), and is also used by KVM. STAF seems to have originally been an IBM internal proje

Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal for Gluster 3.5: New test framework

On 14/08/2013, at 6:40 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> I'll put this info into a Feature Page if people think >> it's worth writing up and taking further. > > +1. I think this would be really nice to have. Cool. Initial page here: http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Multi-Nod

Re: [Gluster-devel] RPM re-structuring

On 08/14/2013 02:57 PM, Anand Avati wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Deepak C Shetty mailto:deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote: On 08/14/2013 02:23 PM, Anand Avati wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Deepak C Shetty mailto:deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:

Re: [Gluster-devel] Spelling error patch for 3.4.x

Hi Patrick, It would be good if you submitted following this - http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Development_Work_Flow Thanks for the patch On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:07 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Hello, > > could you please apply the attached patch? Thanks! > > -- > /

Re: [Gluster-devel] RPM re-structuring

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Deepak C Shetty < deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On 08/14/2013 02:23 PM, Anand Avati wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Deepak C Shetty < > deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >> On 08/14/2013 01:37 PM, Anand Avati wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On

Re: [Gluster-devel] RPM re-structuring

On 08/14/2013 02:23 PM, Anand Avati wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Deepak C Shetty mailto:deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote: On 08/14/2013 01:37 PM, Anand Avati wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Deepak C Shetty mailto:deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:

Re: [Gluster-devel] RPM re-structuring

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Anand Avati wrote: > > Actually this *wasnt* what we discussed. glusterfs-api was supposed to > depend on glusterfs-libs *ONLY*. This is because it has a linking (hard) > relationship with glusterfs-libs, and glusterfs.rpm is only a run-time > dependency - everythi

[Gluster-devel] Spelling error patch for 3.4.x

Hello, could you please apply the attached patch? Thanks! -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/ E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org */ # Fix spelling error. diff -Naur glusterfs-3.4

Re: [Gluster-devel] RPM re-structuring

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Harshavardhana wrote: > >> >> Actually this *wasnt* what we discussed. glusterfs-api was supposed to >> depend on glusterfs-libs *ONLY*. This is because it has a linking (hard) >> relationship with glusterfs-libs, and glusterfs.rpm is only a run-time >> dependency

Re: [Gluster-devel] RPM re-structuring

On 08/14/2013 02:23 PM, Anand Avati wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Deepak C Shetty mailto:deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote: On 08/14/2013 01:37 PM, Anand Avati wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Deepak C Shetty mailto:deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:

Re: [Gluster-devel] RPM re-structuring

> > > > Actually this *wasnt* what we discussed. glusterfs-api was supposed to > depend on glusterfs-libs *ONLY*. This is because it has a linking (hard) > relationship with glusterfs-libs, and glusterfs.rpm is only a run-time > dependency - everything here is dlopen()ed. > > rpm uses 'ldd' command

Re: [Gluster-devel] RPM re-structuring

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Deepak C Shetty < deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On 08/14/2013 01:37 PM, Anand Avati wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Deepak C Shetty < > deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >> On 07/29/2013 12:18 AM, Anand Avati wrote: >> >> >> >> >>

Re: [Gluster-devel] RPM re-structuring

On 08/14/2013 01:37 PM, Anand Avati wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Deepak C Shetty mailto:deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote: On 07/29/2013 12:18 AM, Anand Avati wrote: On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Vijay Bellur mailto:vbel...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi A

Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal for Gluster 3.5: Better peer identification

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Kaushal M wrote: > Hi all, > We recently had a mailing list discussion about the current problems > with peer identification and handling multiple networks. This proposal > is regarding better identification of peers. > > Currently, the way we identify peers is no

Re: [Gluster-devel] RPM re-structuring

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Deepak C Shetty < deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On 07/29/2013 12:18 AM, Anand Avati wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> There was a recent thread on fedora-devel about bloated glusterfs >> dependency

Re: [Gluster-devel] RPM re-structuring

On 08/14/2013 12:55 PM, Deepak C Shetty wrote: On 07/29/2013 12:18 AM, Anand Avati wrote: On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Vijay Bellur > wrote: Hi All, There was a recent thread on fedora-devel about bloated glusterfs dependency for qemu: https

Re: [Gluster-devel] RPM re-structuring

On 07/29/2013 12:18 AM, Anand Avati wrote: On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Vijay Bellur > wrote: Hi All, There was a recent thread on fedora-devel about bloated glusterfs dependency for qemu: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-