On 06/04/2014, at 5:51 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Justin Clift wrote:
>> Thoughts? :)
>
> NetBSD regression tests would test FFS.
That's a good point. :)
As an update, I've just now (about 1 hour ago) gotten
the regression tests to pass cleanly on Rackspace
without any failures.
And as soon
Justin Clift wrote:
> Thoughts? :)
NetBSD regression tests would test FFS.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
wrote:
>
> hi Shyam,
> Instead of printing numbers as msg-ids, could we print the
> stringification of macro itself as the msg-id? Reasons why I feel this is
> better:
> - No need to worry about msg-id range segment overlaps as we a
On 04/05/2014 10:27 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 05/04/2014, at 5:17 PM, James wrote:
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
So, are people interested in us running the tests on other
brick filesystem types, such as ext4? (or whatever else)
Yes, absolutely, but I think it's btrfs
On 05/04/2014, at 5:17 PM, James wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
>> So, are people interested in us running the tests on other
>> brick filesystem types, such as ext4? (or whatever else)
>
> Yes, absolutely, but I think it's btrfs that will matter, not ext4.
Cool.
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
> So, are people interested in us running the tests on other
> brick filesystem types, such as ext4? (or whatever else)
Yes, absolutely, but I think it's btrfs that will matter, not ext4.
___
Gluster
Hi all,
At the moment our automatic regression tests only run against a
single brick filesystem type, XFS.
The next version of our automatic regression tests will create
new virtual machine instances on demand in Rackspace.
Part of this creation process formats a disk to
filesystem type specifi
