Sean Davis wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Kevan Benson kben...@a-1networks.comwrote:
Anand Babu Periasamy wrote:
2.0.0rc1 will be available in a week. Before we call it 2.0.0, we want to
to achieve the following:
* Binary packages for GNU/Linux (rpm/deb), FreeBSD, Mac OS X and Solaris
In my install of 1.4rc7, /sbin/mount.glusterfs is a simple shell
script, and glusterfs is actually a symlink to glusterfsd. So, in
short, I'd have to say that in 1.4rc7, yes, the client and server are
one binary.
Dan Parsons
On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Kevan Benson wrote:
Sean Davis
Dan Parsons wrote:
In my install of 1.4rc7, /sbin/mount.glusterfs is a simple shell script,
and glusterfs is actually a symlink to glusterfsd. So, in short, I'd
have to say that in 1.4rc7, yes, the client and server are one binary.
Oh, well mark that down to me not showing due diligence.
I'm about to switch from 1.3.11 to the latest rc of 1.4... how much
different will 2.0 be from 1.4? Or will 2.0 effectively be the latest
version of 1.4 rc7 + bug fixes etc? Or will it be a totally different
branch?
I suppose the best course of action would be to wait until 2.0 but I
I'm about to switch from 1.3.11 to the latest rc of 1.4... how much
different will 2.0 be from 1.4? Or will 2.0 effectively be the latest
version of 1.4 rc7 + bug fixes etc? Or will it be a totally different
branch?
It will be 1.4 rc7 + bug fixes.
Dear Community,
Since the 1.3 release, we have come a long way to reach this level of code
maturity.
We are preparing to call the next release as the 2.0.0 instead of 1.4.0. There
are
real technical reasons to do so. We want to sincerely apologize for this
confusion.
REASONS FOR THE VERSION
