Martin Fick wrote:
--- On Thu, 1/7/10, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
Shehjar Tikoo wrote:
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Martin Fick wrote:
--- On Wed, 1/6/10, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net
wrote:
I don't think it would be wasted if it
includes NLM since unfsd does not do locking!
It does
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Martin Fick wrote:
--- On Wed, 1/6/10, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
With native NFS there'll be no need to first mount a
glusterFS
FUSE based volume and then export it as NFS. The way
it has been developed is that
any glusterfs volume in the volfile can be
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Shehjar Tikoo wrote:
- Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, but Google has failed
me and it is rather related to the upcoming Gluster NFS export
feature. What I'm interested in knowing is whether it will be
possible to
Anand Avati wrote:
So - I did a redneck test instead - dd 64MB of /dev/zero to a file on the
mounted partition.
On writes, NFS gets 4.4MB/s, GlusterFS (server side AFR) gets 4.6MB/s.
Pretty even.
On reads GlusterFS gets 117MB/s, NFS gets 119MB/s (on the first read after
flushing the caches,
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Gordan Bobic wrote:
With native NFS there'll be no need to first mount a glusterFS
FUSE based volume and then export it as NFS. The way it has been
developed is that
any glusterfs volume in the volfile can be exported using NFS by adding
an NFS volume over it in the
Shehjar Tikoo wrote:
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Martin Fick wrote:
--- On Wed, 1/6/10, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
With native NFS there'll be no need to first mount a
glusterFS
FUSE based volume and then export it as NFS. The way
it has been developed is that
any glusterfs volume in
Shehjar Tikoo wrote:
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Gordan Bobic wrote:
With native NFS there'll be no need to first mount a glusterFS
FUSE based volume and then export it as NFS. The way it has been
developed is that
any glusterfs volume in the volfile can be exported using NFS by adding
an NFS
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Shehjar Tikoo wrote:
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Martin Fick wrote:
--- On Wed, 1/6/10, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
With native NFS there'll be no need to first mount a
glusterFS
FUSE based volume and then export it as NFS. The way
it has been developed is that
any
Shehjar Tikoo wrote:
The answer to that lies in another question, why would anyone use
a standardized NFS over GlusterFS?
Here are three points from pnfs.com on why:
1. Ensures Interoperability among vendor solutions
2. Allows Choice of best-of-breed products
3. Eliminates Risks of deploying
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Shehjar Tikoo wrote:
The answer to that lies in another question, why would anyone use
a standardized NFS over GlusterFS?
Here are three points from pnfs.com on why:
1. Ensures Interoperability among vendor solutions
2. Allows Choice of best-of-breed products
3. Eliminates
--- On Thu, 1/7/10, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
Shehjar Tikoo wrote:
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Martin Fick wrote:
--- On Wed, 1/6/10, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net
wrote:
I don't think it would be wasted if it
includes NLM since unfsd does not do locking!
It does not do
Shehjar Tikoo wrote:
- Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, but Google has failed
me
and it is rather related to the upcoming Gluster NFS export feature.
What I'm interested in knowing is whether it will be possible to run
Gluster NFS
Martin Fick wrote:
--- On Wed, 1/6/10, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
With native NFS there'll be no need to first mount a
glusterFS
FUSE based volume and then export it as NFS. The way
it has been developed is that
any glusterfs volume in the volfile can be exported
using NFS by
--- On Wed, 1/6/10, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
With native NFS there'll be no need to first mount a
glusterFS
FUSE based volume and then export it as NFS. The way
it has been developed is that
any glusterfs volume in the volfile can be exported
using NFS by adding
an NFS
Gordan Bobic wrote:
With native NFS there'll be no need to first mount a glusterFS
FUSE based volume and then export it as NFS. The way it has been
developed is that
any glusterfs volume in the volfile can be exported using NFS by adding
an NFS volume over it in the volfile. This is something
So - I did a redneck test instead - dd 64MB of /dev/zero to a file on the
mounted partition.
On writes, NFS gets 4.4MB/s, GlusterFS (server side AFR) gets 4.6MB/s.
Pretty even.
On reads GlusterFS gets 117MB/s, NFS gets 119MB/s (on the first read after
flushing the caches, after that it goes
[2010-01-06 21:35:54] N [server-protocol.c:7065:mop_setvolume] server-home:
accepted client from 10.2.3.1:1023
[2010-01-06 21:35:54] N [server-protocol.c:7065:mop_setvolume] server-home:
accepted client from 10.2.3.1:1022
pending frames:
frame : type(1) op(LOOKUP)
frame : type(1) op(LK)
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, but Google has failed me
and it is rather related to the upcoming Gluster NFS export feature.
What I'm interested in knowing is whether it will be possible to run
Gluster NFS export for glfs mounts while using knfsd as per standard for
exporting
- Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, but Google has failed
me
and it is rather related to the upcoming Gluster NFS export feature.
What I'm interested in knowing is whether it will be possible to run
Gluster NFS export for glfs mounts
- Martin Fick mogul...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Tue, 1/5/10, Shehjar Tikoo shehj...@gluster.com wrote:
BTW, we're only supporting NFS over TCP in the upcoming NFS
translator.
On a related note, a few questions:
Will this NFS translator handle locking? Will nfs clients using this
20 matches
Mail list logo
