Hopefully one of the devs can answer this.
I just setup a 2 server cluster. server1 has 144 gigs of free space,
server2 has 78 gigs.
I have both set to do the AFR thing and told the config to replicate *
(all files right?) with 2 copies.
So what happens when I get to 80 gigs, will i start getti
On 6/3/07, Brandon Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hopefully one of the devs can answer this.
I just setup a 2 server cluster. server1 has 144 gigs of free space,
server2 has 78 gigs.
I have both set to do the AFR thing and told the config to replicate *
(all files right?) with 2 copies.
So w
You will get 'out of disk space' error. In this scenario the smaller
disk will limit the overall size. Thinking of which, I think it is a
bug for glusterfs to report the size of the bigger disk, it should be
reporting the smallest size available.
avati
2007/6/3, Brandon Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thinking of which, I think it is a
bug for glusterfs to report the size of the bigger disk, it should be
reporting the smallest size available.
Thinking yet again, I think the current behavior is better. Reporting
the smallest size would be appropriate _only_ if all files are being
replicated wi
(fwd'ing to gluster-devel)
Maybe it could give a sum-up of each "replica"-bricks ?
this makes sense too, where you show the total storage as X, which
gets 'consumed' much faster (as in, when you add a 1MB file, 2 or 3 MB
gets counted for 'used' according to the replication count)
any opinion
On 6/4/07, Anand Avati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(fwd'ing to gluster-devel)
>
> Maybe it could give a sum-up of each "replica"-bricks ?
this makes sense too, where you show the total storage as X, which
gets 'consumed' much faster (as in, when you add a 1MB file, 2 or 3 MB
gets counted for 'us
Yep,
i agree with krishna, AFR is not visible to usr. It should happen in
background, so why the user should be aware of all the 3 or 2 replicated
copies? For a user, if he writes 1MB, he wants to see 1MB as used space. So,
showing the sizeof the first server is better idea. (or even size of
small
Amar S. Tumballi a écrit :
> Yep,
> i agree with krishna, AFR is not visible to usr. It should happen in
> background, so why the user should be aware of all the 3 or 2 replicated
> copies? For a user, if he writes 1MB, he wants to see 1MB as used space.
> So,
> showing the sizeof the first server
No, I think this might confuse the users.
I think showing the info of the first server will be good because
of the reasons mentioned by you in the previous mail. Lets see
if we can come up with an ideal solution.
Krishna
any opinions?
My two cents worth :)
I'm not sure there is an easy w
Krishna Srinivas wrote :
No, I think this might confuse the users.
I think showing the info of the first server will be good because
of the reasons mentioned by you in the previous mail. Lets see
if we can come up with an ideal solution.
The important data for the user is the garanteed FREE spa
10 matches
Mail list logo
