Hi Justin/Mark,
Thank you for detailed answers. I will definitely follow up with any
specific questions. The way I look at translators are like device drivers
in operating system. None of our translators require any changes to
gluster code base. And if they do then my understanding is that under
l
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:35:13 -0400
Muralidhar Balcha wrote:
> Hi,
> Does Gluster licensing allow proprietary translators?
Passed your query on to Richard Fontana from Red Hat Legal,
who provided some really good feedback. :)
Proprietary translators are allowed provided their licensing is not
On 09/30/2013 11:14 PM, John Mark Walker wrote:
It is dual-licensed under the LGPL v3+ and GPL v2, which might allow
what you're looking for.
However, I am not a lawyer, so I recommend you find a licensing expert
for any IP legal advice.
-JM
LGPL V3 and GPL2 allows you to use Gluster's api
It is dual-licensed under the LGPL v3+ and GPL v2, which might allow what
you're looking for.
However, I am not a lawyer, so I recommend you find a licensing expert for any
IP legal advice.
-JM
- Original Message -
> Hi,
> Does Gluster licensing allow proprietary translators?
> Re
Hi,
Does Gluster licensing allow proprietary translators?
Regards,
--
Muralidhar Balcha
508 494 5007
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
