Hi,
I just had a problem with a disk failure. It was an ext3 partition, and
suddenly, bc of a problem, it automatically remounted as read-only.
It was not in a glusterfs setup yet, but it got me thinking...
What would have happened if that partition was in an afr setup?
I think glusterfs would
2008/11/14 Onyx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I just had a problem with a disk failure. It was an ext3 partition, and
> suddenly, bc of a problem, it automatically remounted as read-only.
> It was not in a glusterfs setup yet, but it got me thinking...
> What would have happened if that partition
Vikas Gorur wrote:
2008/11/14 Onyx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I just had a problem with a disk failure. It was an ext3 partition, and
suddenly, bc of a problem, it automatically remounted as read-only.
It was not in a glusterfs setup yet, but it got me thinking...
What would have happened if t
2008/11/14 Onyx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ok, nice!
> But wouldn't that have a huge impact on the write performance?
> How about Unify and DHT? Will those setups survive a write attempt to a
> read-only volume?
Unify and DHT would both return error ("Read-only filesystem") in your
situation.
Vikas
-
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Vikas Gorur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/11/14 Onyx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just had a problem with a disk failure. It was an ext3 partition, and
> > suddenly, bc of a problem, it automatically remounted as read-only.
> > It was not in a gluste
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 1:03 AM, KwangErn Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Vikas Gorur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 2008/11/14 Onyx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I just had a problem with a disk failure. It was an ext3 partition, and
>> > sudden
