Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> With your support I think we can make things better. To avoid
> duplication of work, did you take any tests that you are already
> investigating? If not that is the first thing I will try to find out.
While trying to reproduce the problem in
./tests/basic/afr/a
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> > With your support I think we can make things better. To avoid duplication of
> > work, did you take any tests that you are already investigating? If not that
> > is the first thing I will try to find out.
>
> I will look at the ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-statfs.t probl
Le vendredi 08 janvier 2016 à 21:07 +0530, M S Vishwanath Bhat a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Can you create a user "msvbhat" in build.gluster.org?
Yes, but why exactly ?
i am trying to see what are the access needed for jenkins, and why
people do need a account exactly.
Ideally, I also would like to avoi
Le vendredi 08 janvier 2016 à 03:33 -0500, Jiffin Thottan a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone please lend me netbsd vm to debug issue related with
> mount-nfs-auth.t? (Successfully running on my vm for past three hours)
I would need a ssh key for that, please.
--
Michael Scherer
Sysadmin, Communit
On 01/08/2016 08:18 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
I think we just need to come up with rules for considering a
platform to have voting ability before merging the patch.
I totally agree, except for the "just" part. ;) IMO a platform is much
like a feature in terms of requiring commitment/acc
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 09:57:01PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> >Next step is to look for loopback devices which backing store are in $B0
> >and unconfigure them.
> Oops, wrong code reading. Is it possible to have loopback devices not in
> use, that we miss out on destroying? Could be a
On 01/08/2016 08:50 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 08:37:16PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
NetBSD)
vnd=`vnconfig -l | \
awk '!/not in use/{printf("%s%s:%d ", $1, $2, $5);}'`
Can there be Loopback devices that are in
Hi,
Can you create a user "msvbhat" in build.gluster.org?
Best Regards,
Vishwanath
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 08:37:16PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> NetBSD)
> vnd=`vnconfig -l | \
> awk '!/not in use/{printf("%s%s:%d ", $1, $2, $5);}'`
>
> Can there be Loopback devices that are in use when this piece of the code is
> executed
On 01/08/2016 08:14 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 10:56:22AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:18:02PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
With your support I think we can make things better. To avoid duplication of
work, did you take any tests
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 10:56:22AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:18:02PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> > With your support I think we can make things better. To avoid duplication of
> > work, did you take any tests that you are already investigating? If not t
> I think we just need to come up with rules for considering a
> platform to have voting ability before merging the patch.
I totally agree, except for the "just" part. ;) IMO a platform is much
like a feature in terms of requiring commitment/accountability,
community agreement on cost/b
Does it seems reasonable? That way nothing can hang more than 2 hours.
That addresses the technical issue of hanging tests. It doesn't address
the process issue of the entire project and development team being held
hostage to one feature.
Guys,
I think we just need to come up with ru
CC'ing Thiago.
> > Hi,
> >
> > We've been occasionally using gluster-swift-f22-1 (162.242.167.100) and
> > gluster-swift-el7-1 (162.242.167.103) for CI of swiftonfile project
> > (hosted externally at review.openstack.org).
> > Reviving CI for gluster-swift project (hosted on review.gluster.org)
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:18:02PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> With your support I think we can make things better. To avoid duplication of
> work, did you take any tests that you are already investigating? If not that
> is the first thing I will try to find out.
I will look at the ./t
Le vendredi 08 janvier 2016 à 04:57 -0500, Prashanth Pai a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We've been occasionally using gluster-swift-f22-1 (162.242.167.100) and
> gluster-swift-el7-1 (162.242.167.103) for CI of swiftonfile project (hosted
> externally at review.openstack.org).
> Reviving CI for gluster-swif
On 01/08/2016 03:25 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:18:02PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
Should the cleanup script needs to be manually executed on the NetBSD
machine?
You can run the script manually, but if the goal is to restore a
misbehaving machine, rebooti
- Original Message -
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 05:11:22AM -0500, Jeff Darcy wrote:
> > [08:45:57] ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-statfs.t ..
> > [08:43:03] ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-statfs.t ..
> > [08:40:06] ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-statfs.t ..
> > [08:08:51] ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-statfs
On 01/08/2016 03:57 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 05:11:22AM -0500, Jeff Darcy wrote:
[08:45:57] ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-statfs.t ..
[08:43:03] ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-statfs.t ..
[08:40:06] ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-statfs.t ..
[08:08:51] ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-stat
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 05:11:22AM -0500, Jeff Darcy wrote:
> [08:45:57] ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-statfs.t ..
> [08:43:03] ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-statfs.t ..
> [08:40:06] ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-statfs.t ..
> [08:08:51] ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-statfs.t ..
> [08:06:44] ./tests/basic/afr/
> I am a bit disturbed by the fact that people raise the
> "NetBSD regression ruins my life" issue without doing the work of
> listing the actual issues encountered.
That's because it's not a simple list of persistent issues. As with
spurious regression-test failures on Linux, it's an ever changi
Hi,
We've been occasionally using gluster-swift-f22-1 (162.242.167.100) and
gluster-swift-el7-1 (162.242.167.103) for CI of swiftonfile project (hosted
externally at review.openstack.org).
Reviving CI for gluster-swift project (hosted on review.gluster.org) is under
way. I intend to use the abo
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:18:02PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> Should the cleanup script needs to be manually executed on the NetBSD
> machine?
You can run the script manually, but if the goal is to restore a
misbehaving machine, rebooting is probbaly the fastest way to sort
the issu
On 01/08/2016 02:08 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 11:45:20AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
1) How to set up NetBSD VMs on my laptop which is of exact version as the
ones that are run on build systems.
Well, the easier way is to pick the VM image we run at rackspa
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:42:36PM +0530, Sachidananda URS wrote:
> I have a NetBSD 7.0 installation which I can share with you, to get
> started.
> Once manu@ gets back on a specific version, I can set that up too.
NetBSD 7.0 is fine and has everything required in GENERIC kernel.
--
Emmanuel Dr
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 11:45:20AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> 1) How to set up NetBSD VMs on my laptop which is of exact version as the
> ones that are run on build systems.
Well, the easier way is to pick the VM image we run at rackspace, which
relies on Xen. If you use an hardware v
Hi,
Can anyone please lend me netbsd vm to debug issue related with
mount-nfs-auth.t? (Successfully running on my vm for past three hours)
With Regards,
Jiffin
___
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/lis
27 matches
Mail list logo
