[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1584992] Need python pep8 and other relevant tests in smoke if a patch includes any python file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584992 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nig...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1585055] Moving parsefuse to gluster project on Github

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585055 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC|

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1584998] need automatic inclusion of few reviewers to a given patch ( after 2 weeks)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584998 --- Comment #1 from Amar Tumballi --- Notice that this has a problem that we can get into infinite loop of warning people every 2weeks of inactivity, but never reaching 90days. Hence we need a mechanism to identify the patches only once, ie,

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1585055] New: Moving parsefuse to gluster project on Github

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585055 Bug ID: 1585055 Summary: Moving parsefuse to gluster project on Github Product: GlusterFS Version: mainline Component: project-infrastructure Assignee: b...@gluster.org

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1584998] New: need automatic inclusion of few reviewers to a given patch (after 2 weeks )

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584998 Bug ID: 1584998 Summary: need automatic inclusion of few reviewers to a given patch (after 2 weeks) Product: GlusterFS Version: mainline Component: project-infrastructure

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1584992] New: Need python pep8 and other relevant tests in smoke if a patch includes any python file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584992 Bug ID: 1584992 Summary: Need python pep8 and other relevant tests in smoke if a patch includes any python file Product: GlusterFS Version: mainline Component:

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1577668] Regressions/smoke/other tests failing in build ( due to new deprecated warnings)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577668 Shyamsundar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1575386 (glusterfs-4.1.0) | Referenced

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1580503] New: Privacy alias needed

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1580503 Bug ID: 1580503 Summary: Privacy alias needed Product: GlusterFS Version: mainline Component: website Assignee: b...@gluster.org Reporter: a...@redhat.com

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564119] need option 'run all-tests-in-regression' in reviews

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564119 Amar Tumballi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED ---

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1578295] Experiment with havaged on gerrit server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578295 M. Scherer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msche...@redhat.com

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1570161] New mailing list: t...@gluster.org

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570161 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nig...@redhat.com

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1578295] New: Experiment with havaged on gerrit server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578295 Bug ID: 1578295 Summary: Experiment with havaged on gerrit server Product: GlusterFS Version: mainline Component: project-infrastructure Assignee: b...@gluster.org

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1577668] Regressions/smoke/other tests failing in build ( due to new deprecated warnings)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577668 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST --- Comment #2

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1577668] Regressions/smoke/other tests failing in build ( due to new deprecated warnings)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577668 sankarshan changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1577668] New: Regressions/smoke/other tests failing in build ( due to new deprecated warnings)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577668 Bug ID: 1577668 Summary: Regressions/smoke/other tests failing in build (due to new deprecated warnings) Product: GlusterFS Version: mainline Component:

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1576161] New: output / reason of compare-bug-and-report should be added along with 'FAILURE'

of Bugzilla check in smoke. 1. No Reference (BUG/Issue) ID 2. Product is not GlusterFS 3. Posted Bug Status is not valid 4. Posted Bug is not marked for relevant release version. (like a bug of 4.0 version is posted for release-4.1 branch). Would be great to see the reason coming out to gerrit

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1575487] New: New machine for workerant

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575487 Bug ID: 1575487 Summary: New machine for workerant Product: GlusterFS Version: mainline Component: project-infrastructure Assignee: b...@gluster.org Reporter:

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1567880] Grant Deepshikha access to all CI-related infrastructure

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567880 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1556834] Retire/close 3.13 gerrit dashboard

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556834 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1575388] Request gerrit dashboard addition for 4.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575388 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1575387] Restrict gerrit merge permissions for branch release-4.1 to release owners

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575387 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1556834] Retire/close 3.13 gerrit dashboard

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556834 --- Comment #1 from Shyamsundar --- Ping... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HloGGo6JhP=cc_unsubscribe

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1575388] New: Request gerrit dashboard addition for 4.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575388 Bug ID: 1575388 Summary: Request gerrit dashboard addition for 4.1 Product: GlusterFS Version: 4.1 Component: project-infrastructure Assignee: b...@gluster.org Reporter:

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1575387] New: Restrict gerrit merge permissions for branch release-4.1 to release owners

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575387 Bug ID: 1575387 Summary: Restrict gerrit merge permissions for branch release-4.1 to release owners Product: GlusterFS Version: 4.1 Component: project-infrastructure

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1567880] Grant Deepshikha access to all CI-related infrastructure

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567880 --- Comment #7 from M. Scherer --- I have added the access 2 days ago, seems I forgot to announce on this bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1574984] New: Switch 5 builders in the cage to Fedora 28

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574984 Bug ID: 1574984 Summary: Switch 5 builders in the cage to Fedora 28 Product: GlusterFS Version: mainline Component: project-infrastructure Assignee: b...@gluster.org

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1573488] infra: comment-on-issue can't handle anything except ASCII

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573488 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1567880] Grant Deepshikha access to all CI-related infrastructure

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567880 Deepshikha khandelwal changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1573783] New: Few jenkins plugins need to be installed

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573783 Bug ID: 1573783 Summary: Few jenkins plugins need to be installed Product: GlusterFS Version: 3.13 Component: project-infrastructure Assignee: b...@gluster.org Reporter:

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1573488] New: infra: comment-on-issue can' t handle anything except ASCII

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573488 Bug ID: 1573488 Summary: infra: comment-on-issue can't handle anything except ASCII Product: GlusterFS Version: mainline Component: project-infrastructure

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #30 from Xavi Hernandez --- (In reply to Jeff Darcy from comment #24) > Personally I'm willing to go with the flow on those. I've laid out my > reasoning, other people seem less inclined to compromise, I think

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1570161] New mailing list: t...@gluster.org

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570161 Amye Scavarda changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1570161] New mailing list: t...@gluster.org

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570161 --- Comment #2 from Amye Scavarda --- Ping on this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=agOoRGLgjj=cc_unsubscribe

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #29 from Nigel Babu --- Um, so I've been accepting the pull requests that come in more or less mostly so we can see what the output looks like. I'm going to wait for 24h for each of the remaining pull requests

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #28 from Xavi Hernandez --- (In reply to Aravinda VK from comment #27) > I prefer Right(`AlignEscapedNewlines=Right`), since Patch will have minimum > number of lines change on modification. For example, > >

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #27 from Aravinda VK --- (In reply to Xavi Hernandez from comment #19) > I made a mistake on one of the proposed values: > > AlignEscapedNewLinesLeft=false > > What I wanted to propose was to set it to

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #25 from Xavi Hernandez --- I don't want to start any battle. It was requested to create pull requests with the proposed changes and that's what I've done. I've not hidden that some of the changes are

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #23 from Xavi Hernandez --- The change will also include some of the controversial options: IndentCaseLabels=true SpaceBeforeParens=ControlStatements What should we do with them ? -- You are receiving this

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #22 from Xavi Hernandez --- Some issues I've seen: * Some initializations are formatted like this: char gfid_local[GF_UUID_BUF_SIZE] = { 0, }; I've tried to change

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #21 from Jeff Darcy --- The feedback so far has been strongly positive, but one issue has been raised. As Xavi mentioned, the PointerAlignment doesn't seem to work properly on lines affected by AlignConsecutive*.

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1570161] New mailing list: t...@gluster.org

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570161 --- Comment #1 from Amye Scavarda --- Editing to add: Archives are private, not that the list should be invisible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1563379] infra: smoke glusterfs-logs.tar.gz has core file(s) but not the executables

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563379 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(nig...@redhat.com | |)

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1570576] Comment on issue should leave a comment with the exact issue on the review

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570576 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Common on issue should |Comment on issue should

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1570576] New: Common on issue should leave a comment with the exact issue on the review

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570576 Bug ID: 1570576 Summary: Common on issue should leave a comment with the exact issue on the review Product: GlusterFS Version: mainline Component: project-infrastructure

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #19 from Xavi Hernandez --- I made a mistake on one of the proposed values: AlignEscapedNewLinesLeft=false What I wanted to propose was to set it to 'true' (which matches the explanation I gave). -- You

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #18 from Jeff Darcy --- Monday morning EST would be fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #17 from Amar Tumballi --- Thanks for these pointers Jeff, makes the case even more critical to work towards. Shyam kindly agreed to make this a blocker for 4.1 branching out, which means, we have to come to

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #16 from Jeff Darcy --- FWIW, since this came up in the maintainers' meeting... The inconsistency of style has had a measurable negative impact on ramp-up time for new developers at Facebook. I'm sure the same

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1568488] Is fstat.gluster.org capturing all the regression failures?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568488 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #15 from Xavi Hernandez --- (In reply to Jeff Darcy from comment #13) > IndentCaseLabels: personally I don't like indenting case labels because they > create a gap with no close brace - unless people put

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 Amar Tumballi changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|unspecified |high ---

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1568488] Is fstat.gluster.org capturing all the regression failures?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568488 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nig...@redhat.com

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #13 from Jeff Darcy --- IndentCaseLabels: personally I don't like indenting case labels because they create a gap with no close brace - unless people put braces around cases, which is a bad habit for other reasons

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #12 from Xavi Hernandez --- Using Chromium as base, basically the changes you propose seem ok. I would like to propose these additional changes: * I prefer to use 4 spaces for indent. 2 seems too few to me.

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #11 from Jeff Darcy --- Whatever we pick is going to require some tweaking. Some of the things I notice: * All use two-space indents, which I personally find atrocious. * All put a function's type on the same

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1568488] New: Is fstat.gluster.org capturing all the regression failures?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568488 Bug ID: 1568488 Summary: Is fstat.gluster.org capturing all the regression failures? Product: GlusterFS Version: mainline Component: project-infrastructure

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1549000] line-coverage tests not capturing details properly.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549000 Amar Tumballi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #10 from Amar Tumballi --- (Update from Nigel) Which format should we start with as base? Google/LLVM/Mozilla/Webkit/Chromium *

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #9 from Amar Tumballi --- (In reply to Nigel Babu from comment #7) > Alright. So we have agreement that this is a good idea. How do we want to > implement this? As a check or as a pre-commit hook? This is a

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #8 from Amar Tumballi --- (In reply to Shreyas Siravara from comment #6) > Whoever came up with this idea is a genius, and I totally ack it :) All credits for this to Shreyas Siravara! As the original idea

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nig...@redhat.com

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564115] need option 'run brick-mux-tests' in reviews

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564115 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST --- Comment #5

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1567880] Grant Deepshikha access to all CI-related infrastructure

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567880 --- Comment #5 from M. Scherer --- I am also ok with all access, if someone explain the best practice regarding ssh security and stuff like this. (ideally, key on a smartcard/yubikey, but at minima, password protected ssh

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1567880] Grant Deepshikha access to all CI-related infrastructure

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567880 Worker Ant <bugzilla-...@gluster.org> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MO

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1567880] Grant Deepshikha access to all CI-related infrastructure

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567880 --- Comment #3 from Nigel Babu --- Yeah, we have the option of either setting two levels or giving all access and depending on trust. Right now, I'm looking for all Jenkins nodes, build.gluster.org, and the associated

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1567880] Grant Deepshikha access to all CI-related infrastructure

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567880 M. Scherer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msche...@redhat.com

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1567880] New: Grant Deepshikha access to all CI-related infrastructure

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567880 Bug ID: 1567880 Summary: Grant Deepshikha access to all CI-related infrastructure Product: GlusterFS Version: mainline Component: project-infrastructure

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1549662] infra: create nfs-ganesha@ and nfs-ganesha-devel@

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549662 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1567221] New: Issue checking should ensure required flags are present , even on newer patchsets in gerrit

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567221 Bug ID: 1567221 Summary: Issue checking should ensure required flags are present, even on newer patchsets in gerrit Product: GlusterFS Version: mainline Component:

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1491156] Aborted test runs in jenkins don't have cores

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491156 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1493408] abort regression jobs after a period of inactivity rather than a hard timeout of 360 minutes

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493408 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1558335] gluster-block: discontinue gerrit

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558335 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1545003] Create a new list: automated-test...@gluster.org

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545003 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1377533] Run check-bugs.py on weekly basis in Jenkins and have it send emails

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377533 Amar Tumballi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1382097] netbsd core and log files are not downloadable

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382097 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1563379] infra: smoke glusterfs-logs.tar.gz has core file(s) but not the executables

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563379 Kaleb KEITHLEY changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1551513] Need merge rights for gdeploy repository on github

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551513 Ramakrishna Reddy Yekulla changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1566449] New: Disable the + ban for email on the mailing list

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566449 Bug ID: 1566449 Summary: Disable the + ban for email on the mailing list Product: GlusterFS Version: mainline Component: project-infrastructure Assignee: b...@gluster.org

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564139] need a test to validate flags and validity of github issues.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564139 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |CURRENTRELEASE --

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564139] need a test to validate flags and validity of github issues.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564139 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564139] need a test to validate flags and validity of github issues.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564139 --- Comment #3 from Nigel Babu --- This has now landed. Notable missing feature - if there is an existing issue on the commit, we don't check if it has all the flags. Going to keep this issue open till I fix that. -- You

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1562699] ./tests/basic/afr/afr-no-fsync.t fails on jenkins slaves

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562699 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1562132] Please add TravisCI to new repo

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562132 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564372] Setup Nagios server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564372 --- Comment #2 from Nigel Babu --- I'd say alert to a list like ale...@gluster.org. We'll still do best effort working day coverage. This only enhances our ability to see what fails sooner than someone else noticing the

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 Shreyas Siravara changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sshre...@fb.com

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564451] New: The abandon job for patches should post info in bugzilla that some patch is abandon 'd.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564451 Bug ID: 1564451 Summary: The abandon job for patches should post info in bugzilla that some patch is abandon'd. Product: GlusterFS Version: mainline Component: project

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564139] need a test to validate flags and validity of github issues.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564139 --- Comment #2 from Amar Tumballi --- The note to community was that we are willing to make edits to behavior on discussion, and will go ahead and implement soon for making sure we have documentation for the features. Can

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564372] New: Setup Nagios server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564372 Bug ID: 1564372 Summary: Setup Nagios server Product: GlusterFS Version: 4.0 Component: project-infrastructure Assignee: b...@gluster.org Reporter: nig...@redhat.com

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564115] need option 'run brick-mux-tests' in reviews

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564115 --- Comment #4 from Amar Tumballi --- No serious need of 'Vote' at present. This can be 'SUCCESS', 'FAILURE', ABORT or whatever.. as the person triggering the run, I would look up the result before voting. Lets get the

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564139] need a test to validate flags and validity of github issues.

at.com --- Comment #1 from Nigel Babu <nig...@redhat.com> --- 1. Referencing the wrong issue is not something we can control. You can always make a mistake in either smoke or bugzilla. That's something I cannot control. 2. The code for ensuring the rest is ready for merge pending agreement from t

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564115] need option 'run brick-mux-tests' in reviews

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564115 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nig...@redhat.com

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #5 from Jeff Darcy --- I think we're all in agreement on spaces vs. tabs. Tabs are eight spaces wide, full stop, end of story. It's kind of survivable with eight-space indents, but any other indent width becomes a

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 --- Comment #4 from Shyamsundar --- Overall ack to the proposal. Nice call-out by Jeff on any other change requiring a big-bang addressing to be a part of the same. I can live with 4 spaces :), but no tabs (way too much

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 Xavi Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564149] New: Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564149 Bug ID: 1564149 Summary: Agree upon a coding standard, and automate check for this in smoke Product: GlusterFS Version: mainline Component: project-infrastructure

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1563379] infra: smoke glusterfs-logs.tar.gz has core file(s) but not the executables

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563379 Kaleb KEITHLEY changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Triaged

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564139] New: need a test to validate flags and validity of github issues.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564139 Bug ID: 1564139 Summary: need a test to validate flags and validity of github issues. Product: GlusterFS Version: mainline Component: project-infrastructure

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1563379] infra: smoke glusterfs-logs.tar.gz has core file(s) but not the executable

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563379 Nigel Babu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nig...@redhat.com

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1564115] New: need option 'run brick-mux-tests' in reviews

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564115 Bug ID: 1564115 Summary: need option 'run brick-mux-tests' in reviews Product: GlusterFS Version: mainline Component: project-infrastructure Severity: high Assignee:

[Gluster-infra] [Bug 1563279] Repo broken for Debian Stretch

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563279 Kaleb KEITHLEY changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

<    8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   >