Le vendredi 23 octobre 2015 à 08:25 +, Emmanuel Dreyfus a écrit :
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 01:52:59PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
> > All arbiter-statfs.t tests that are failing are on
> > nbslave74.cloud.gluster.org.
> > Loopback mounts are not happening on that slave. Perhaps it needs to be
+ gluster-infra
All arbiter-statfs.t tests that are failing are on
nbslave74.cloud.gluster.org.
Loopback mounts are not happening on that slave. Perhaps it needs to be
rebooted.
-Ravi
On 10/23/2015 01:47 PM, Nithya Balachandran wrote:
Hi,
NetBSD regression runs are failing in /tests/basic/
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 01:52:59PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
> All arbiter-statfs.t tests that are failing are on
> nbslave74.cloud.gluster.org.
> Loopback mounts are not happening on that slave. Perhaps it needs to be
> rebooted.
Indeed: the test passes on nbslave70. Someone reboot nbslave74?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 07:35:30AM -0400, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar wrote:
> 1. geo-rep does lazy umount of gluster volume which needs to be modified
>to use 'gf_umount_lazy' provided by libglusterfs, correct?
Yes, that spawns umountd, which does its best to emulate lazy unmount,,
by trying
Lot of test runs are failing with the following:
+ '/opt/qa/build.sh'
File "/usr/pkg/lib/python2.7/site.py", line 601
[2015-08-19 05:45:06.N]:++ G_LOG:./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t:
TEST: 85 ! fd_write 3 content ++
^
SyntaxError: invalid token
+ RET=1
Does i
Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar wrote:
> Since the geo-rep regression tests are failing only in NetBSD, Is there
> a way we can mask it's run only in NetBSD and let it run in linux?
> I am working on geo-rep issues with NetBSD. Once these are fixed we can
> enable on NetBSD as well.
Yes, I can wipe
On 08/18/2015 09:25 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
On 08/17/2015 02:20 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
That patch itself might not pass all regressions as it might fail at the
geo-rep test. I have sent a patch (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11934/)
with both the tests being moved to bad test. Talur could y
On 08/17/2015 02:20 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
> That patch itself might not pass all regressions as it might fail at the
> geo-rep test. I have sent a patch (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11934/)
> with both the tests being moved to bad test. Talur could you please
> abandon 11933.
It seems like w
That patch itself might not pass all regressions as it might fail at the
geo-rep test. I have sent a patch (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11934/)
with both the tests being moved to bad test. Talur could you please
abandon 11933.
Regards,
Avra
On 08/17/2015 02:12 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
tes
tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t has been already been added to bad test by
http://review.gluster.org/11933
~Atin
On 08/17/2015 02:09 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
> Will send a patch moving ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t and
> ./tests/geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t to bad test.
>
> Regards,
> Avra
>
>
Will send a patch moving ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t and
./tests/geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t to bad test.
Regards,
Avra
On 08/17/2015 12:45 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
On 08/17/2015 12:29 PM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
On Monday 17 August 2015 12:22 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
Hi,
The NetBSD re
On 08/17/2015 12:29 PM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
On Monday 17 August 2015 12:22 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
Hi,
The NetBSD regression tests are continuously failing with errors in
the following tests:
./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t
./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t
quota-anon-fd-nfs.t is known iss
12 matches
Mail list logo
