[Gluster-users] glusterfsd unexpected termination

2009-09-29 Thread David Saez Padros
Hi This morning i noticed that in one of the servers glusterfsd daemon was not working, the last log entries were: patchset: v2.0.4 signal received: 11 configuration details:argp 1 backtrace 1 bdb->cursor->get 1 db.h 1 dlfcn 1 fdatasync 1 libpthread 1 llistxattr 1 setfsid 1 spinlock 1 epoll.h 1

Re: [Gluster-users] is glusterfs DHT really distributed?

2009-09-29 Thread David Saez Padros
Hi The second is 'option transport.socket.nodelay on' in each of your protocol/client _and_ protocol/server volumes. where is this option documented ? -- Thanx & best regards ... David Saez Padroshttp://www.o

Re: [Gluster-users] is glusterfs DHT really distributed?

2009-09-29 Thread Mark Mielke
On 09/29/2009 03:39 AM, David Saez Padros wrote: The second is 'option transport.socket.nodelay on' in each of your protocol/client _and_ protocol/server volumes. where is this option documented ? I'm a little surprised TCP_NODELAY isn't set by default? I set it on all servers I write as a m

Re: [Gluster-users] AFR self-heal bug with rmdir (Directory not empty)

2009-09-29 Thread Corentin Chary
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Corentin Chary wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to use glusterfs with afr. > My setup have 2 servers and 2 clients. / is mounted with user_xattr. > It seems that if you shutdown a server, remove a directory with one or > more childs, then restart the server, the changes w

Re: [Gluster-users] is glusterfs DHT really distributed?

2009-09-29 Thread Vijay Bellur
Mark Mielke wrote: I'm a little surprised TCP_NODELAY isn't set by default? I set it on all servers I write as a matter of principle. Serious servers intended to perform well should be able to easily beat the Nagle algorithm. writev(), sendmsg(), or even write(buffer) where the buffer is buil

Re: [Gluster-users] is glusterfs DHT really distributed?

2009-09-29 Thread Vijay Bellur
David Saez Padros wrote: Hi The second is 'option transport.socket.nodelay on' in each of your protocol/client _and_ protocol/server volumes. where is this option documented ? Thanks for pointing this out. We wanted to expose this as a regular option in the upcoming 2.1 release and had in

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfsd unexpected termination

2009-09-29 Thread Vijay Bellur
David Saez Padros wrote: patchset: v2.0.4 signal received: 11 configuration details:argp 1 backtrace 1 bdb->cursor->get 1 db.h 1 dlfcn 1 fdatasync 1 libpthread 1 llistxattr 1 setfsid 1 spinlock 1 epoll.h 1 xattr.h 1 st_atim.tv_nsec 1 package-string: glusterfs 2.0.4 /lib/libc.so.6[0x7ff43f926db0]

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfsd unexpected termination

2009-09-29 Thread David Saez Padros
Hi here you have it: Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/glusterfsd -p /var/run/glusterfsd.pid -f /etc/glusterfs/glusterfsd.vo'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x7f7b568f30a8 in unify_open () from /usr/lib/glusterfs/2.0.4/xlator/cluster/unify.so (gdb) backtrace #

[Gluster-users] gluster / fuse on CentOS 5.2 ?

2009-09-29 Thread Daniel Maher
Hello all, Trying to get Gluster going on a CentOS 5.2 (32bit) machine. The daemon loads OK, but when the client tries, it spits this out in the log : +--+ [2009-09-29 11:02:57] E [xlator.c:736:xlator_init_rec] xlator

Re: [Gluster-users] please remove me from the list. I am using LUSTRE now since glusterfs is fading...

2009-09-29 Thread michael
-Original Message- From: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] On Behalf Of gluster-users-requ...@gluster.org Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 7:53 AM To: gluster-users@gluster.org Subject: Gluster-users Digest, Vol 17, Issue 47 Send Gluster-u

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster / fuse on CentOS 5.2 ?

2009-09-29 Thread Daniel Maher
Daniel Maher wrote: Hello all, Trying to get Gluster going on a CentOS 5.2 (32bit) machine. The daemon loads OK, but when the client tries, it spits this out in the log : +--+ [2009-09-29 11:02:57] E [xlator.c:736:

Re: [Gluster-users] is glusterfs DHT really distributed?

2009-09-29 Thread Wei Dong
I think TCP_NODELAY is critical to performance. Actuall after spending a large number of unfruitful hours on glusterfs, I wrote my own simple shared storage with BerkeleyDB backend, and I found that enabling TCP_NODELAY on my system gives me nearly 10x readback throughput. Thanks for pointing

[Gluster-users] Reporting bugs?

2009-09-29 Thread Will Rouesnel
Has the gluster-devel list been taken down? I've been trying to send messages to it for a while but always get them bounced back as undeliverable. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glus

Re: [Gluster-users] Reporting bugs?

2009-09-29 Thread Vijay Bellur
Will Rouesnel wrote: Has the gluster-devel list been taken down? I've been trying to send messages to it for a while but always get them bounced back as undeliverable. gluster-devel is up and running. I even sent a test mail there for confirmation and it reached the list :) Thanks, Vijay

[Gluster-users] speeding up getdents()/stat() and/or general perf tuning...

2009-09-29 Thread mki-glusterfs
Hi I've been noticing some long delays on doing a simple `ls' in directories that haven't been recently accessed on a test glusterfs system we've put together. The system(s) consists of a 4 node DHT + AFR (x1) setup, running 2.0.6 all with 10GbE connectivity between the nodes (and no there is

Re: [Gluster-users] speeding up getdents()/stat() and/or general perf tuning...

2009-09-29 Thread Mark Mielke
On 09/29/2009 07:14 PM, mki-gluste...@mozone.net wrote: Hi I've been noticing some long delays on doing a simple `ls' in directories that haven't been recently accessed on a test glusterfs system we've put together. The system(s) consists of a 4 node DHT + AFR (x1) setup, running 2.0.6 all with