Re: [Gluster-users] Performance on GlusterFS

2011-06-24 Thread Mohit Anchlia
Can you run dd if=/dev/zero of=/junk bs=128k count=1 oflag=direct on the local file system and then run dd if=/dev/zero of=/client-mount/junk bs=128k count=1 oflag=direct on gluster mounted file system? compare them What's your disk configuration on RHEL in terms of RAID, # of disks

[Gluster-users] Enomaly users, please read -

2011-06-24 Thread Craig Carl
All - Gluster has identified a serious issue that affects anyone hosting VM images for the Enomaly Elastic Cloud Platform with Gluster. This issue is limited to Gluster versions =3.1.4. We strongly encourage anyone using Enomaly and Gluster to upgrade to Gluster version 3.1.5 or higher.

Re: [Gluster-users] UPDATED: Enomaly users, please read -

2011-06-24 Thread Craig Carl
All - A much more detailed update from engineering is below. The range of affected versions is bigger that I thought, I apologize for not getting that right earlier. Please let me know if you have any questions. VERSIONS AFFECTED: All Current GlusterFS releases up to 3.1.5 and 3.2.1

Re: [Gluster-users] UPDATED: Enomaly users, please read -

2011-06-24 Thread John Mark Walker
Howdy, I just wanted to take a moment to thank several people, working quite a few hours today putting together this advisory: Avati - for committing the fixes to the source tree in the first place Vikas - for helping me run down the github commits and issue tracker notes AB - for explaining to

Re: [Gluster-users] Performance on GlusterFS

2011-06-24 Thread Pavan T C
On Friday 24 June 2011 10:29 AM, anish.b.ku...@ril.com wrote: Hi…. I have setup a 4 node cluster on virtual servers on RHEL platform. It would help if you can post the output of gluster volume info, to start with. Are you using some benchmark to compare GlusterFS performance with local