Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster 3.2.1] Réplication issues on a two bricks volume

Hello, Here are the logs we have just before replication failed : [2011-08-02 08:32:33.549303] I [client3_1-fops.c:453:client3_1_readlink_cbk] 0-REP_SVG-client-1: remote operation failed: No such file or directory [2011-08-02 08:32:33.549334] W [fuse-bridge.c:982:fuse_readlink_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fu

Re: [Gluster-users] deleted files make bricks full ?

a simple way to reproduce the issue: 1) NFS mount and create 'foo' and umount. 2) NFS mount and delete 'foo' and umount. 3) replete 1) 2) till ENOSPC. command logs are following: [root@vhead-010 ~]# rpm -qa | grep gluster glusterfs-fuse-3.1.5-1 glusterfs-core-3.1.5-1 [root@vhead-010 ~]# cat /etc/

[Gluster-users] deleted files make bricks full ?

Hi, My simple test program, which repeat create-write-read-delete 64 of 1GB files on 100GB x 4 bricks from 4 NFS clients, fails due to ENOSPC. I found some glusterfsd have many file descriptors of same name, deleted files and these files fill the bricks. Is this know issue? Best, Tomo Sato _

Re: [Gluster-users] xfs+acl

On 2011-08-01 21:56, Amar Tumballi wrote: To use 'acl' below thing should be minimum setup: * glusterfs version 3.2.2 or higher * all exports (ie bricks) mounted with '-oacl' option * all the glusterfs clients mounted with '-oacl' option Oh yes, still 3.2.1. Thank you, tamas _

Re: [Gluster-users] xfs+acl

To use 'acl' below thing should be minimum setup: * glusterfs version 3.2.2 or higher * all exports (ie bricks) mounted with '-oacl' option * all the glusterfs clients mounted with '-oacl' option Regards, Amar On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Papp Tamas wrote: > On 2011-08-01 21:32, Liam Slusse

Re: [Gluster-users] xfs+acl

What version of glusterfs are you on? AFAIK, only >=3.2.2 has ACL support enabled out-of-the box. Also, you must use -o acl on both the backing-store XFS mounts AND the glusterfs client mounts in order for it to work. -Brian Brian Smith Senior Systems Administrator IT Research Computing, Univer

Re: [Gluster-users] xfs+acl

On 2011-08-01 21:32, Liam Slusser wrote: We use XFS with Gluster with great success. We also do. I'm asking about acl. Thank you, tamas ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] xfs+acl

We use XFS with Gluster with great success. On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Papp Tamas wrote: > hi! > > Is this possible? > > Mounting with -o acl doesn't change mount options: > > gl0:/w-vol on /W/Projects type fuse.glusterfs > (rw,allow_other,default_permissions,max_read=131072) > > Of course

[Gluster-users] xfs+acl

hi! Is this possible? Mounting with -o acl doesn't change mount options: gl0:/w-vol on /W/Projects type fuse.glusterfs (rw,allow_other,default_permissions,max_read=131072) Of course setfacl is not working. On server side -o acl is not possible for xfs filesystems. Thank you, tamas

Re: [Gluster-users] 503 Service unavailable load balancing with nginx

Cool..nice to hear that from you. From: Gabriel-Adrian Samfira [samfiragabr...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 9:01 PM To: Gangalwar Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org Subject: RE: [Gluster-users] 503 Service unavailable load balancing with nginx Thats good to

Re: [Gluster-users] 503 Service unavailable load balancing with nginx

Thats good to know! I will increase the limit as needed. For now at least, 5 G is fine. The implicit value in nginx is much lower (few MB). I have to say, so far, gluster with object storage is awesome. Good job to you and the rest of the gluster team! On 2011 8 1 18:25, "Gangalwar" wrote: > Glust

Re: [Gluster-users] 503 Service unavailable load balancing with nginx

Gluster-Object has no such limit on the object size, we can directly store the object of any size without splitting it, its only limitted by your backend capacity i.e. size of glusterfs volume used as account. Swift supports large objects (>5GB) by splitting it into multiple smaller segments and

Re: [Gluster-users] 503 Service unavailable load balancing with nginx

As far as i can tell gluster uses swift for the object storage part. Swift han an arbitrarily set maximum file size of 5 gb. After that you are supposed to split the file in pieces and create a manifest file that is used to concatenate the pieces when downloading. The "st" command does this automat

[Gluster-users] More Troubles with 3.2.2

Hi, Due to previous errors we had deaktivated the replication to the second glusterfs brick. The first try to activate the second brick went terribly wrong, ending in lots of old data. For our new try, we removed all the old data before adding the second brick. This looked quiet good, and I

[Gluster-users] Fwd: nfs.rpc-auth-allow : not working in 3.2.1 (but two patches fix that)

same in 3.2.2. i.e. #gluster volume set preprod nfs.rpc-auth-allow "192.168.10.*" : not working, *ANY* nfs client ips can mount the volume. we have submit a patch, then use patch from others. But why i'ts not commited to a release ? wiki explain this feature. thanks, - Mail transféré --

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster 3.2.1] Réplication issues on a two bricks volume

First of all, we have milions of this lines : [2011-08-01 10:30:30.155065] W [inode.c:1035:inode_path] 0-/storage/backup/inode: no dentry for non-root inode 392601459: ef33731f-7c5c-435e-b300-2ffe2ab1c155 [2011-08-01 10:30:30.155767] W [inode.c:1035:inode_path] 0-/storage/backup/inode: no dentry fo

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster 3.2.1] Réplication issues on a two bricks volume

I'm sorry, someone of my team has flushed the logs, and restart rebalance... I will give you logs as soon as possible, when the problem will come again. You want me to create a distributed / replicated

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster 3.2.1] Réplication issues on a two bricks volume

Can you please provide logs for the errors you are facing? Also, rebalance was not the right operation to be done in your situation. You don't seem to have a distributed setup (but a pure replicate instead) in which case rebalance is really not achieving anything for you. Avati On Mon, Aug 1, 20

[Gluster-users] [Gluster 3.2.1] Réplication issues on a two bricks volume

Hello, I have installed GlusterFS one month ago, and replication have many issues : First of all, our infrastructure, 2 storage array of 8Tb in replication mode... We have our backups file on this arrays, so 6Tb of datas. I want replicate datas on the second storrage array, so, i use this command