Hello list,
I'm experimenting with a little GlusterFS cluster on debian wheezy:
=== snip ===
muzzy:~# cat /etc/debian_version
wheezy/sid
muzzy:~# dpkg -l | grep gluster
ii glusterfs-client 3.2.6-1 clustered file-system (client package)
ii glusterfs-common 3.2.6-1 GlusterFS common libraries and
Hi,
I have Gluster 3.2.6 RPM's for Citrix XenServer 6.0. I've installed and
mounted exports, but that's where I stopped.
My issues are:
1. XenServer mounts the NFS servers SR subdirectory, not the export. Gluster
won't do that.
-- I can, apparently, mount the gluster export somewhere else,
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 09:54:58PM +0200, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
we are planning a new infrastructure based on gluster to be used by
some mail servers and some web servers.
We plan 4 server, with 6x 2TB SATA disks in RAID-5 hardware each.
In a replicate-distribute volume
My suggestion is actually to not use Gluster currently for XenServer. A bug
I filed about two years ago for using Gluster as a XenServer back-end was
just fixed in 3.3. If you're going to use Gluster+Xen, use 3.3.
As for NFS, make sure that you changed the NFS port to 2049 in the
configuration
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Justice London wrote:
My suggestion is actually to not use Gluster currently for XenServer. A bug
I filed about two years ago for using Gluster as a XenServer back-end was
just fixed in 3.3. If you're going to use Gluster+Xen, use 3.3.
As for NFS, make sure that you
No, it was finally fixed in 3.3 so it does per-byte locking rather than
per-file.
Justice
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Stratton [mailto:nat...@robotics.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:56 AM
To: Justice London
Cc: 'Gerald Brandt'; 'gluster-users'
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users]
Dear list,
I forgot to add info about extended fs attributes for directories with
quota in my glusterfs setup. Here it is:
=== snip ===
(o) muzzy, aka g0
muzzy:~# getfattr -m . -d -e hex /g0/dav/128mb
getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names
# file: g0/dav/128mb
2012/4/19 Brian Candler b.cand...@pobox.com
Much less than the performance degradation you'll get from using RAID-5!
I think that i'll go with RAID1 plus LVM.
This will give me much more flexibility.
Just a question:
let's assume a brick made with 1 RAID1+LVM volume of 100GB.
What happens
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Ionescu, A. a.ione...@student.vu.nl wrote:
Thanks for your answer, Sabuj. However, I am not sure I understand what you
mean by trying with ipoib.
Do you mean specifying transport tcp and using the ipoib ips/hostnames for
the bricks?
If you manage to find a
Where are these RPM's? I wouldn't mind giving them a test drive myself.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Gerald Brandt g...@majentis.com wrote:
Hi,
I have Gluster 3.2.6 RPM's for Citrix XenServer 6.0. I've installed and
mounted exports, but that's where I stopped.
My issues are:
1.
Hi all,
After lots of looking at just about all the distributed file systems out
there I have decided that I like the simple setup of GlusterFS the best and
not having to have a metadata server seems like a good idea.. The issue I
have is working out the best way to setup the cluster we are
11 matches
Mail list logo
