OK, figured this one out (my word this took some time). Found an
attribute set on the fourth node after running through them again.
Back to work... after patching all nodes and removing/recreating the
volume, this now works for me. Definitely not simple and please, if we can
clean up volumes a
Can you get the output of getfattr -d -e hex -m . /gfs
Avati
On Jun 26, 2012 5:08 PM, "Simon Blackstein" wrote:
> Thanks Brian.
>
> Yes, got rid of the .glusterfs and .vSphereHA directory that VMware
> makes. Rebooted, so yes it was remounted and used a different mount
> point name. Also got rid
Thanks Brian.
Yes, got rid of the .glusterfs and .vSphereHA directory that VMware
makes. Rebooted, so yes it was remounted and used a different mount
point name. Also got rid of attribute I found set on the root:
setfattr -x trusted.gfid / && setfattr -x trusted.glusterfs.dht /
Any other tips? :
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:46:52AM -0700, Simon Blackstein wrote:
>Basically did all of that as previously noted:
And rm -rf .glusterfs ?
If /gfs is the mountpoint, you could also try
unmount /gfs
rmdir /gfs
mkdir /gfs
and remount.
___
Glus
Basically did all of that as previously noted:
setfattr -x trusted.gfid /gfs
setfattr -x trusted.glusterfs.volume-id /gfs
setfattr -x trusted.afr.gfs-vdi-client-0 /gfs
setfattr -x trusted.afr.gfs-vdi-client-1 /gfs
setfattr -x trusted.glusterfs.dht /gfs
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Brian
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:01:21AM -0700, Simon Blackstein wrote:
>Honestly, I've been trying to reset this volume completely to see if
>the error was transitional but now getting the '/gfs or a prefix of it
>is already part of a volume' message even after removing the attributes
>f
I changed the mount point here, but still the same issue. I'd rather not
kill the LVM partition if possible. Anand, any tips for this?
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Fernando Frediani (Qube) <
fernando.fredi...@qubenet.net> wrote:
> Yeah, that’s quiet annoying on 3.3
>
> I’ve run into the
Yeah, that's quiet annoying on 3.3
I've run into the same problem when trying to re-create a volume made of the
same disks that I couldn't get rid of even using these commands, so I ended up
replacing the physical disks and re-creating the partition.
Even when you do a Delete on the volume it see
Honestly, I've been trying to reset this volume completely to see if the
error was transitional but now getting the '/gfs or a prefix of it is
already part of a volume' message even after removing the attributes from
the directory... lots of changes in this version to watch out for :(
setfattr -x
Is this at the same 'time' as before (at the time for VM boot), or does it
actually progress a little more (i.e, "start booting") and then throw up?
It will be helpful if we move this discussion to bugzilla and you provide
trace logs.
Avati
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Simon Blackstein wrote
Hi Avati,
Thanks. I just tried a recompile (I'd installed from RPM before) and
brought up the volume again. I now get a similar but different message:
An unexpected error was received from the ESX host while powering on VM
vm-26944.
Failed to power on VM.
Could not power on VM : Not found.
Failed
Suppose:
I have two gluster clients:
- Producer-Client and Consumer-Client
Can I use any of the Gluster replication features (either
replicated-volumes or geo-replication) to create two replicas of my
data so that all operations performed by "Producer-Client" goes to
replica1 and and all operat
I found some memory leaks in 3.2 release, which, overtime, add up to a lot of
leakage, but they are fixed in 3.3. We will fix them in 3.2 too, but the best
option,IMO would be to upgrade to 3.3. Please let us know if you find any in
3.3 too.
Regards,
Rajesh Amaravathi,
Software Engineer, Glust
Fernando,
Yes, to try the patch you need to install from source. We will include
the patch in the next release if you need RPMs.
Avati
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Fernando Frediani (Qube) <
fernando.fredi...@qubenet.net> wrote:
> Hi Avati,
>
> ** **
>
> How I suppose to apply the pat
Hi Avati,
How I suppose to apply the patch if I have installed the RPM version ? Should I
have a compiled from source installed instead ?
Regards,
Fernando
From: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org
[mailto:gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] On Behalf Of Anand Avati
Sent: 26 June 2012 04:00
T
15 matches
Mail list logo
