Re: [Gluster-users] Split brain that is not split brain

On 09/09/2014 11:35 AM, Ilya Ivanov wrote: Ahh, thank you, now I get it. I deleted it on one node and it replicated to another one. Now I get the following output: [root@gluster1 var]# gluster volume heal gv01 info Brick gluster1:/home/gluster/gv01/ Number of entries: 1 Brick gluster2:/home/

Re: [Gluster-users] How to eliminate the spam log in etc-glusterfs-glusterd.vol.log

XiaoZan, The socket_connect error logs that you are observing are not really spam logs. With this snippet of log it's impossible to say why you are seeing these logs. The reason you see the log message repeat is because gluster's transport layer tries to connect once every 3s until it successfull

Re: [Gluster-users] Split brain that is not split brain

On 09/09/2014 01:54 AM, Ilya Ivanov wrote: Hello. I've Gluster 3.5.2 on Centos 6. A primitive replicated volume, as describe here . I tried to simulate split-brain by te

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs replica volume self heal dir very slow！！why？

Hi Paul Robert Marino and Roman thank you very much for you advise！ to Paul Robert Marino： In fact， I use XFS as the underlying filesystem in my test cases。 NOW, According to your advise， I will increse the background self heal count to test， I will do a feedback after my t

[Gluster-users] How to eliminate the spam log in etc-glusterfs-glusterd.vol.log

Hi, everyone, I installed glusterfs 3.4.4. on 9 nodes, and create a distributed、replica volume, with the following parameters set: diagnostics.client-log-level: WARNING diagnostics.brick-log-level: WARNING performance.write-behind: off performance.io-cache: off cluster

[Gluster-users] Split brain that is not split brain

Hello. I've Gluster 3.5.2 on Centos 6. A primitive replicated volume, as describe here . I tried to simulate split-brain by temporarily disconnecting the nodes and creating a

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Proposal for GlusterD-2.0

That's disappointing. I can certainly understand wanting to keep dependencies small, but that sounds like FUD more than a reasoned argument. I do not envy your position navigating such waters. On Sep 8, 2014, at 2:38 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: >> Is there any reason not to consider zookeeper? > >

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Proposal for GlusterD-2.0

> Is there any reason not to consider zookeeper? I did bring up that idea a while ago. I'm no Java fan myself, but still I was surprised by the vehemence of the reactions. To put it politely, many seemed to consider the dependency on Java unacceptable for both resource and security reasons. Som

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Proposal for GlusterD-2.0

Is there any reason not to consider zookeeper? The 3.4 release is quite stable and due to a large number of users, bugs are fixed and its quirks are known. I like the idea of RAFT. The paper is well written and very compelling. The last time I read it, a number of critical issues were glossed over

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster-users Digest, Vol 77, Issue 2

> Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:17:25 +0800 > From: Jaden Liang > To: gluster-de...@gluster.org, gluster-users@gluster.org > Subject: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Regarding the write > performance in replica 1 volume in 1Gbps Ethernet, get about 50MB/s > while writing sin

[Gluster-users] glusterfs-3.4.6beta1 released

SRC: http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.4.6beta1.tar.gz This release is made off jenkins-release-87 -- Gluster Build System ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/lis

[Gluster-users] peer has no files

I have a gluster 3.2.7 cluster with 51 peers and 3x replication. I've had to replace several of the peers recently, I've done that one at a time. Then I did a rebalance after replacing each peer. The last two that I replaced don't have any files on them. I've rebalanced several times on the pe

[Gluster-users] distributed files disappearing

Hello all, I'm running gluster 3.4.2-1 on rhel 6.5 (don't worry, we'll be moving to RHS soon ;) I just added a brick to an existing volume and suddenly my files can no longer be accessed by the client. This is what I did: [root@lpr-nas01 in]# gluster vol info prd_yearlyextract Volume Name: prd_

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Proposal for GlusterD-2.0

On 8 September 2014 05:05, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote: > > > > Bulk of current GlusterD code deals with keeping the configuration of the > > cluster and the volumes in it consistent and available across the nodes. > The > > current algorithm is not scalable (N^2 in no. of nodes) and doesn't > p

Re: [Gluster-users] IOPS and CPU cycles, what is the relationship between the two?

Thank Oliver, Well considering that TCP-Offloading do exists on the NIC hardware then it's down to a bit less. Now the controller is the basic limit. I know I want to learn system engineering :D I am a SysAdmin for about 8 years now and it's interesting enough to make me think about all sorts