- Original Message -
| From: Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com
| To: gluster-users Discussion List Gluster-users@gluster.org, Gluster
Devel gluster-de...@gluster.org, Humble
| Chirammal hchir...@redhat.com
| Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 3:21:47 PM
| Subject: Re: [Gluster-users]
Hi all,
In about one hour we will have the regular weekly Gluster Community
meeting.
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
- date: every Wednesday
- time: 12:00 UTC, 13:00 CET (in your terminal, run: date -d 12:00 UTC)
- agenda:
Hi Kotresh,
Thanks for the tip. Unfortunately that does not seem to have any effect.
The path to the gluster binaries was already in $PATH. I did try adding the
path to the gsyncd binary, but same result. Contents of $PATH are:
Symlinking gluster to /usr/bin/ seems to have resolved the path issue.
Thanks for the tip there.
Now there's a different error throw in the geo-rep/ssh...log:
[2014-12-10 07:32:42.609031] E
[syncdutils(monitor):240:log_raise_exception] top: FAIL:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:09:49PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote:
Hi all,
In about one hour we will have the regular weekly Gluster Community
meeting.
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
- date: every Wednesday
- time: 12:00 UTC, 13:00 CET (in your terminal, run:
Hi!
I am having trouble mounting a Gluster volume. After issuing the mount
command nothing happens. It is the same for CentOS6 and CentOS7 clients.
Both are updated to the latest package versions. I am using the official
Gluster repository in both clients:
On 10/12/14 16:57 +0100, Mitja Mihelič wrote:
Hi!
I am having trouble mounting a Gluster volume. After issuing the mount
command nothing happens. It is the same for CentOS6 and CentOS7 clients.
Both are updated to the latest package versions. I am using the official
Gluster repository in
Hi,I am learning GlusterFS 3.6
I did some testing, using Redhat Documentation. They use thin LVM with XFS on
top of the brick.
I have two questions about adding more space to a volume.
Adding space can be done by adding a new brick (distributed configuration), but
it could also be done by adding
Per your suggestion I tired this:
env -i LC_NUMERIC=en_US.UTF-8 mount -t glusterfs -o transport=tcp
GLUSTER-1.NAME.SI://wp-vol-1 /mnt/volume-1
And it works.
Mounting of volumes via fstab works also.
Regards, Mitja
--
Mitja Mihelič
ARNES, Tehnološki park 18, p.p. 7, SI-1001 Ljubljana,
Of course you can always add space to the volume that works well. The reason you may want to consider adding bricks is if you enable striping in gluster with the mirroring you will probably see better performance on your reads and writes.-- Sent from my HP Pre3On Dec 10, 2014 11:21 AM, wodel
Hi,
what happens if the number of replica in a volume is not equal to the number
of bricks?
Sample: I have a volume with 4 bricks (on four peers) and only what to have
two replicats of every file. Is that possible?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Michael Schwartzkopff
--
[*] sys4 AG
Yes it's totally possible. If you are going to use replica 2, you will need
an even number of bricks in your volume, for instance 2, 4 6, 8, etc.
Gluster will set the volume as a distributed replicated volume.
2014-12-10 17:54 GMT-03:00 Michael Schwartzkopff m...@sys4.de:
Hi,
what happens if
Am Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2014, 18:02:57 schrieb Juan José Pavlik Salles:
Yes it's totally possible. If you are going to use replica 2, you will need
an even number of bricks in your volume, for instance 2, 4 6, 8, etc.
Gluster will set the volume as a distributed replicated volume.
According to the docs (Link
http://gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Gluster_3.1:_Configuring_Distributed_Replicated_Volumes)
The number of bricks should be a multiple of the replica count for a
distributed replicated volume.. What I understand is that creating a
replica 2 volume with
What happens if I have 3 peers for quorum. I create 3 bricks and want to have
only two replicas in my volume.
The number of *bricks* must be a multiple of the replica count, but
quorum is based on the number of *servers* and there can be multiple
bricks per server. Therefore, if you have
Hi Dave,
Two things.
1. I see the gluster has been upgraded from 3.4.2 to 3.5.3.
Geo-rep has undergone design changes to make it distributed
between these releases
(https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/master/doc/admin-guide/en-US/markdown/admin_distributed_geo_rep.md).
Have you
Hi,
Suddenly all of my VM on one host paused with the following error :-
vm has paused due to unknown storage error
I am using glusterfs storage with distributed replicate replica=2my
storage and compute both running on the same node...
engine logs :- http://ur1.ca/j31iu
Host logs :-
17 matches
Mail list logo