Re: [Gluster-users] Peer Rejected(Connected) and Self heal daemon is not running causing split brain

Hi everyone, I managed to fix my problem. It was an old process of gluster which was using up the ports.. i manually killed all the processes and the corresponding /var/run file used by that process before starting a new instance of gluster and it worked fine. What i did was : service glusterfs

Re: [Gluster-users] How do I replace a failed brick

On 02/27/2015 07:10 AM, Cary Tsai wrote: Assume I have 4 bricks in a replica (count=2) volume: Volume Name: data-vol Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4 Brick1: 192.168.1.101/brick Brick2: 192.168.1.102/brick Brick3: 192.168.1.103/brick

[Gluster-users] How do I replace a failed brick

Assume I have 4 bricks in a replica (count=2) volume: Volume Name: data-vol Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4 Brick1: 192.168.1.101/brick Brick2: 192.168.1.102/brick Brick3: 192.168.1.103/brick Brick4: 192.168.1.104/brick Something happens to Brick3 and I want to replace it by 192.168.1.105/brick

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer Rejected(Connected) and Self heal daemon is not running causing split brain

Hi atin, I have tried to flush the iptables and this time i managed to get the peer into cluster. However, the self heal daemon is still offline and im unable to bring the daemon back online on gfs2. Doing a heal on either server gives me a succesful output but when i check the heal info i am gett

[Gluster-users] NFS I/O errors after replicated -> distributed+replicate add-brick

Hi, all: We had a two-node gluster cluster (replicated, 2 replicas) that recently we added two more node/bricks to and performed a rebalance upon, thus making it a distributed-replicate volume. Since doing so, we now see for any NFS access, read or write, a “Remote I/O error” whenever performi

Re: [Gluster-users] When will 3.6 be considered stable?

Guys, I'm new to the GlusterFS community, so please forgive any noobishness. I'm wondering if there are any torture tests or some other collection of test cases that would allow system builders to exercise their configs prior to production deployment. How do folks here go about their stress t

Re: [Gluster-users] When will 3.6 be considered stable? (was: Replace brick 3.4.2 with 3.6.2?)

On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 21:24 +, Justin Clift wrote: > On 26 Feb 2015, at 18:39, Kingsley wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 23:27 +0200, aytac zeren wrote: > >> 3.6.2 is a major release and introduces some new features in cluster > >> wide concept. Additionally it is not stable yet. > > > > Hi,

Re: [Gluster-users] When will 3.6 be considered stable? (was: Replace brick 3.4.2 with 3.6.2?)

On 26 Feb 2015, at 18:39, Kingsley wrote: > On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 23:27 +0200, aytac zeren wrote: >> 3.6.2 is a major release and introduces some new features in cluster >> wide concept. Additionally it is not stable yet. > > Hi, > > When will 3.6 be considered stable? I'm waiting to deploy a cl

[Gluster-users] When will 3.6 be considered stable? (was: Replace brick 3.4.2 with 3.6.2?)

On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 23:27 +0200, aytac zeren wrote: > 3.6.2 is a major release and introduces some new features in cluster > wide concept. Additionally it is not stable yet. Hi, When will 3.6 be considered stable? I'm waiting to deploy a cluster into a production environment. I've built a 3.6.2

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Functional Test Suite of Glusterfs

On 26 February 2015 at 18:50, Justin Clift wrote: > On 26 Feb 2015, at 09:55, Kiran Patil wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Currently I am aware of Gluster Regression Test suite. > > > > I would like to know if there is a Test suite which covers the > > Functionality of Glusterfs. > > > > If not then what

Re: [Gluster-users] Functional Test Suite of Glusterfs

On 26 Feb 2015, at 09:55, Kiran Patil wrote: > Hi, > > Currently I am aware of Gluster Regression Test suite. > > I would like to know if there is a Test suite which covers the > Functionality of Glusterfs. > > If not then what are the options do we have to come up with Functional > test suite.

Re: [Gluster-users] Functional Test Suite of Glusterfs

I thought of first get some functional tests out of regression suite. Do you agree with this approach or shall we write functional tests without borrowing them from regression tests at all. If you agree then here are some of the testcases I have noted down to include as part functional testing and

[Gluster-users] Functional Test Suite of Glusterfs

Hi, Currently I am aware of Gluster Regression Test suite. I would like to know if there is a Test suite which covers the Functionality of Glusterfs. If not then what are the options do we have to come up with Functional test suite. The only option we have right now is to use Gluster Regression

Re: [Gluster-users] Peer Rejected(Connected) and Self heal daemon is not running causing split brain

Could you check the N/W firewall setting? Flush iptable setting using iptables -F and retry. ~Atin On 02/26/2015 02:55 PM, Kaamesh Kamalaaharan wrote: > Hi guys, > > I managed to get gluster running but im having a couple of issues with my > setup 1) my peer status is rejected but connected 2) m

[Gluster-users] Peer Rejected(Connected) and Self heal daemon is not running causing split brain

Hi guys, I managed to get gluster running but im having a couple of issues with my setup 1) my peer status is rejected but connected 2) my self heal daemon is not running on one server and im getting split brain files. My setup is two gluster volumes (gfs1 and gfs2) on replicate each with a brick

Re: [Gluster-users] Upgrading from 3.6.2-1 to 3.6.2-2 causes "failed to get the 'volume file' from server"

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:52:02AM -0800, Michael Bushey wrote: > On a Debian testing glusterfs cluster, one node of six (web1) was > upgraded from 3.6.2-1 to 3.6.2-2. All looks good server side, and > gdash looks happy. The problem is this node is no longer able to mount > the volumes. The server