Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.5.2 upgrade to Gluster 3.6.3 QEMU gfafpi complications

2015-05-05 Thread Josh Boon
Yeah I'll be doing a test upgrade and migration to make sure it works in the lap but my production stuff significantly more busy so we'll see if it folds under pressure. My biggest concern is when I'll have one node 3.5.2 and one node 3.6.3 in a replica set. I don't see any major reason why they

[Gluster-users] Monitoring / Stats

2015-05-05 Thread Oliver
Hi gluster users, I have a few questions about monitoring and statistics. We are about to install a distributed/replicated volume on multiple servers for redundancy and scalability on ubuntu14. How can I ensure that really all files are distributed to multiple servers ? Do I have any chance

Re: [Gluster-users] performance tuning - list of available options?

2015-05-05 Thread Ben Turner
- Original Message - > From: "Mohammed Rafi K C" > To: "Vijay Bellur" , "Kingsley" > , gluster-users@gluster.org, > "Raghavendra Gowdappa" > Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 9:09:31 AM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] performance tuning - list of available options? > > > > On 05/05/2015 05:

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Rep. 3.5.3, Missing Files, Incorrect "Files Pending"

2015-05-05 Thread David Gibbons
I caught one of the nodes transitioning into faulty mode, log output is below. > In master nodes, look for log messages. Let us know if you feel any issue > in log messages. (/var/log/glusterfs/geo-replication/) > When one of the nodes drops into "faulty", which happens periodically, this is the

Re: [Gluster-users] performance tuning - list of available options?

2015-05-05 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 05/05/2015 06:39 PM, Mohammed Rafi K C wrote: On 05/05/2015 05:24 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 05/05/2015 04:34 PM, Kingsley wrote: On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 15:08 +0530, Vijay Bellur wrote: [snip] I have seen this before and it primarily seems to be related to the readdir calls done by git clo

Re: [Gluster-users] performance tuning - list of available options?

2015-05-05 Thread Mohammed Rafi K C
On 05/05/2015 05:24 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On 05/05/2015 04:34 PM, Kingsley wrote: >> On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 15:08 +0530, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> [snip] >>> I have seen this before and it primarily seems to be related to the >>> readdir calls done by git clone. >>> >>> Turning on these options m

Re: [Gluster-users] Multi-tenancy

2015-05-05 Thread Steven Bowker
Thanks Jeff. As most of clients will be using CIFS we are thinking of running a dedicated samba servers (VM) per client. It doesn’t scale well but could give a little more control with sensitive clients. Regards, Steve -Original Message- From: Jeff Darcy [mailto:jda...@redhat.com] Se

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Rep. 3.5.3, Missing Files, Incorrect "Files Pending"

2015-05-05 Thread David Gibbons
Thank you, responses and further questions inline below. > In master nodes, look for log messages. Let us know if you feel any issue > in log messages. (/var/log/glusterfs/geo-replication/) > The workers have been transitioning between active and faulty. They will throw an error in the log (I be

[Gluster-users] CTDB and Samba compatible versions

2015-05-05 Thread Sharad Shukla
Dear All, I am currently using Glusterfs with clustering solution of Ctdb and samba. I am using ctdb version : ctdb-2.5.1-1.el6.x86_64 and samba version : samba-3.6.23-14.el6_6.x86_64 But looks like these are not the compatible versions and Samba is failed to start after starting ctdb. Please p

Re: [Gluster-users] [Centos7.1x64 / GlusterFS 3.6.3] Geo-replication faulty state

2015-05-05 Thread wodel youchi
Hi, any help? :( 2015-05-04 12:02 GMT+01:00 wodel youchi : > Hi, > > Centos7.1 x64 updated > > GlusterFS 3.6.3 latest > > [root@glustersrv1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep gluster > glusterfs-libs-3.6.3-1.el7.x86_64 > glusterfs-cli-3.6.3-1.el7.x86_64 > glusterfs-api-3.6.3-1.el7.x86_64 > glusterfs-server

Re: [Gluster-users] performance tuning - list of available options?

2015-05-05 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 05/05/2015 04:34 PM, Kingsley wrote: On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 15:08 +0530, Vijay Bellur wrote: [snip] I have seen this before and it primarily seems to be related to the readdir calls done by git clone. Turning on these options might help to some extent: gluster volume set performance.readdir

[Gluster-users] REMINDER: Gluster Community Bug Triage meeting today at 12:00 UTC (~in 10 minutes)

2015-05-05 Thread Atin Mukherjee
Hi all, This meeting is scheduled for anyone that is interested in learning more about, or assisting with the Bug Triage. Meeting details: - location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC ( https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=gluster-meeting ) - date: every Tuesday - time: 12:00 UTC

[Gluster-users] iscsi and distributed volume

2015-05-05 Thread luca giacomelli
HI, I tried to compile tgt on Centos 6.6 following Dan instructions (http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2015-April/021394.html). The system is clean and before compile tgt I installed gluster 3.6.3 and scsi-target-utils here what I do: git clone https://github.com/fujita/tgt.git yum

[Gluster-users] performance tuning - list of available options?

2015-05-05 Thread Kingsley
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 15:08 +0530, Vijay Bellur wrote: [snip] > I have seen this before and it primarily seems to be related to the > readdir calls done by git clone. > > Turning on these options might help to some extent: > > gluster volume set performance.readdir-ahead on > > gluster volume

[Gluster-users] Fwd: Samba fails to start

2015-05-05 Thread Sharad Shukla
Hi Raghavendra and friends, >> This usually happens when samba , ctdb are of incompatible versions or are built with different configs. >> Please provide version details of Samba and ctdb and source you download from. *Below are the versions of ctdb and samba :* ---

Re: [Gluster-users] Fwd:Re: client is terrible with large amount of small files

2015-05-05 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 05/05/2015 03:43 PM, Kamal wrote: Hi Vijay, We Tried the same. But its doesn't improve speed. For testing glusterfs, we are running storage in virtual machines. Is that will make any difference ? Performance testing on physical machines is a better bet as it takes some variables aw

Re: [Gluster-users] Fwd:Re: client is terrible with large amount of small files

2015-05-05 Thread Kamal
Hi Vijay, We Tried the same. But its doesn't improve speed. For testing glusterfs, we are running storage in virtual machines. Is that will make any difference ? But, copying the same folder between two storage machines is really fast. fyi. Regards, Kamal On Tue, 05 May 2015 15:

Re: [Gluster-users] Fwd:Re: client is terrible with large amount of small files

2015-05-05 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 05/05/2015 12:59 PM, Kamal wrote: Hi Amukher, Even after upgrade to 3.7 small files transfer rate is slow. Below is the volume info. Volume Name: integvol1 Type: Replicate Volume ID: 31793ba4-eeca-462a-a0cd-9adfb281225b Status: Started Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 Transport-type: t

Re: [Gluster-users] New Gluster Website

2015-05-05 Thread Soumya Deb
On 5 May 2015, at 04:24, Justin Clift wrote: > On 4 May 2015, at 12:52, Soumya Deb wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Gluster 3.7 release is nearing & I was really expecting to have a brand new > > website to look forward to with the new release (along with the new docs). > > > > Last discussion we ha

Re: [Gluster-users] Fwd:Re: client is terrible with large amount of small files

2015-05-05 Thread Kamal
Hi Amukher, Even after upgrade to 3.7 small files transfer rate is slow. Below is the volume info. Volume Name: integvol1 Type: Replicate Volume ID: 31793ba4-eeca-462a-a0cd-9adfb281225b Status: Started Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: integ-gluster1:/srv