Re: [Gluster-users] Serious performance problem

On 27 October 2015 at 08:06, Stefan Michael Guenther wrote: > But I learned from the mailing list, that this is a common message and > that I shouldn't me concerned about it. > > But the problem is, when I copy a 1.2 GB file from /root to /mnt (gluster > volume mounted via

Re: [Gluster-users] Serious performance problem

Hi Lindsay, thanks for your information and comment. > Hi Stefan, a bit more information on your setup would be useful > - Brick topology - replica 3? distributed? > yes, replica 3. The cluster is used for load balancing, therefore we have the needed applications and data on all three nodes. >

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] VM fs becomes read only when one gluster node goes down

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 01:56:31AM +0200, Roman wrote: > Aren't we are talking about this patch? > https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-qemu-kvm.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/gluster-backupserver.patch;h=ad241ee1154ebbd536d7c2c7987d86a02255aba2;hb=HEAD No, a backup-volserver option is only effective

Re: [Gluster-users] Serious performance problem

On 27 October 2015 at 18:17, Stefan Michael Guenther wrote: > 2 x Intel Gigabit > And ethtool tells me that it is indeed a gigabit link. > How are the configured? are they bonded? what sort of network switch do you have? Ideally they would be LACP bonded with a switch

Re: [Gluster-users] MTU size issue?

Hi Atin, You’re right in saying if it’s activate then all nodes should have it activated. What I find strange is that when glusterfsd has problems communicating with the other peers that that single node with issues isn’t considered “not connected” and thus expelled from the cluster somehow;

Re: [Gluster-users] MTU size issue?

-Atin Sent from one plus one On Oct 27, 2015 6:40 PM, "Sander Zijlstra" wrote: > > Hi Atin, > > You’re right in saying if it’s activate then all nodes should have it activated. > > What I find strange is that when glusterfsd has problems communicating with the other

[Gluster-users] Rebooting gluster nodes make VMs pause due to storage error

Hi, We're using ovirt 3.5.3.1, and as storage backend we use GlusterFS. We added a Storage Domain with the path "gluster.fqdn1:/volume", and as options, we used "backup-volfile-servers=gluster.fqdn2". We now need to restart both gluster.fqdn1 and gluster.fqdn2 machines due to system update

Re: [Gluster-users] Does Glusterfs works with ipv6?

Guys, why don't you make builds with working ipv6?This problem was fixed here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117886But new builds still not work with ipv6 correctly.I tried with 3.4, 3.5 and 3.6. So glusterfs is not scalable ;) 23.01.2015, 14:31, "Олег Кузнецов"

Re: [Gluster-users] Rebooting gluster nodes make VMs pause due to storage error

Hi Nicolas, Here are my experiences with GlusterFS 3.6 & 3.7 on a dual-replica set up. First of all, setting the "network.ping-timeout" to a low value (3-5 seconds) helps in avoiding a 42 second freeze on the clients as mentioned in other threads. This value seems to matter even if the

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] VM fs becomes read only when one gluster node goes down

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Niels, my network.ping-timeout was already set to 5 seconds. Unfortunately it seems i dont have the timout setting in Ubuntu 14.04 for my vda disk. ls -al /sys/block/vda/device/ gives me only: drwxr-xr-x 4 root root0 Oct 26 20:21 ./

[Gluster-users] Missing files after add new bricks and remove old ones - how to restore files

Hi, we had a 2 node glusterfs cluster. we had a 2x2 Distributed-Replicate volume on it. It was: Brick1: s20gfs.ovirt:/gluster/VOL/brick1 Brick2: s21gfs.ovirt:/gluster/VOL/brick2 Brick3: s20gfs.ovirt:/gluster/VOL/brick3 Brick4: s21gfs.ovirt:/gluster/VOL/brick4 We added more nodes to the cluster.