Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] 3.7.5 upgrade issues

I have filed a bug for this on bugzilla. Here is the link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276029. Please cc yourself for updates on the bug. Thanks, Raghavendra Talur ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] VM fs becomes read only when one gluster node goes down

I am running Ovirt and self-hosted engine with additional vms on a replica two gluster volume. I have an "arbiter" node and set quorum ratio to 51%. The arbiter node is just another machine with the glusterfs bits installed that is part of the gluster peers but has no bricks to it. You will have

Re: [Gluster-users] Shard Volume testing (3.7.5)

- Original Message - > From: "Lindsay Mathieson" > To: "Krutika Dhananjay" > Cc: "gluster-users" > Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 1:08:33 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Shard Volume testing (3.7.5) > On

Re: [Gluster-users] Rebooting gluster nodes make VMs pause due to storage error

On 10/27/2015 10:54 PM, Nicolás wrote: Hi, We're using ovirt 3.5.3.1, and as storage backend we use GlusterFS. We added a Storage Domain with the path "gluster.fqdn1:/volume", and as options, we used "backup-volfile-servers=gluster.fqdn2". We now need to restart both gluster.fqdn1 and

Re: [Gluster-users] Shard Volume testing (3.7.5)

- Original Message - > From: "Lindsay Mathieson" > To: "Krutika Dhananjay" > Cc: "gluster-users" > Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 5:17:09 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Shard Volume testing (3.7.5) > On

Re: [Gluster-users] Shard Volume testing (3.7.5)

On 28 October 2015 at 17:03, Krutika Dhananjay wrote: > So sharding also helps with better disk utilization in > distributed-replicated volumes for large files (like VM images). > .. There are other long-term benefits one could reap from using sharding: for > instance, for

Re: [Gluster-users] Shard Volume testing (3.7.5)

- Original Message - > From: "Lindsay Mathieson" > To: "Krutika Dhananjay" > Cc: "gluster-users" > Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 1:08:33 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Shard Volume testing (3.7.5) > >

Re: [Gluster-users] New user, couple of questions (sharding+discard, arbiters, shutting down nodes)

- Original Message - > From: "Alan Hodgson" > To: gluster-users@gluster.org > Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 11:22:24 PM > Subject: [Gluster-users] New user, couple of questions (sharding+discard, > arbiters, shutting down nodes) > I have a couple of 2-node

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] VM fs becomes read only when one gluster node goes down

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 07:21:35PM +0100, André Bauer wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi Niels, > > my network.ping-timeout was already set to 5 seconds. > > Unfortunately it seems i dont have the timout setting in Ubuntu 14.04 > for my vda disk. > > ls -al

[Gluster-users] Gluster 3.7.6 release preparation

Hi All, 3.7.6 is scheduled to be released by the end of this month.[1] If you want to propose a bug to go in this release, please add it to the tracker bug. [2] If the patch for the proposed bugs are merged by 30 October they will make it into this release. List of patches already merged in 3.7

Re: [Gluster-users] Copy operation freezes. Lots of locks in state BLOCKED (3-node setup with 1 arbiter)

Hello Pranith, Thank you for prompt reaction. I didn't get back to this until now, because I had other problems to deal with. Are there chances that it will get released this or next month? If not, I will probably have to resort to compiling on my own. Regards, Adrian 2015-10-26 12:37

Re: [Gluster-users] Copy operation freezes. Lots of locks in state BLOCKED (3-node setup with 1 arbiter)

On 10/28/2015 04:27 PM, Adrian Gruntkowski wrote: Hello Pranith, Thank you for prompt reaction. I didn't get back to this until now, because I had other problems to deal with. Are there chances that it will get released this or next month? If not, I will probably have to resort to

Re: [Gluster-users] New user, couple of questions (sharding+discard, arbiters, shutting down nodes)

I've had zero issues using client quorum (cluster.quorum-type =auto) and three nodes/bricks. Testing using node shutdown and node kills. I'd really recommend going with three nodes - maybe one as a arbiter volume if disk space is an issue. On 29 October 2015 at 03:52, Alan Hodgson