- Original Message -
> From: "Lindsay Mathieson"
> To: "gluster-users"
> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 9:20:52 AM
> Subject: [Gluster-users] More Peculiar heal behaviour after removing brick
>
> Maybe I'm doing some wrong here but I'm not sure what, or maybe this is
> normal behavio
Could you share the logs?
I'd like to look at the glustershd logs and etc-glusterfs-glusterd.vol.log
files.
-Krutika
- Original Message -
> From: "Lindsay Mathieson"
> To: "gluster-users"
> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 9:20:52 AM
> Subject: [Gluster-users] More Peculiar heal be
Hi
I could solve this problem. I completely removed the existing
packages and installed the new packages manually.
Thanks
JK
On Jan 22, 2016 2:47 PM, "jayakrishnan mm"
wrote:
> Hi Atin,
>
> On Ubuntu 14.04
>
> arjun@arjun-desktop:~/Downloads$ *sudo dpkg -i
> glusterfs-client_3.7.6-ubuntu1
3.5.7 also hangs.only the flush op hung. Yes,off the
performance.client-io-threads ,no hang.
The hang does not relate the client kernel version.
One client statdump about flush op,any abnormal?
[global.callpool.stack.12]
uid=0
gid=0
pid=14432
unique=16336007098
lk-owner=77cb199aa36f3641
op
Also, I've repeated the same "find" test again, but with glusterfs process
launched under valgrind. And here is valgrind output:
https://gist.github.com/097afb01ebb2c5e9e78d
On неділя, 24 січня 2016 р. 09:33:00 EET Mathieu Chateau wrote:
> Thanks for all your tests and times, it looks promising
I am happy to announce the General Availability of Gluster 3.6 and 3.7
for CentOS 6 on x86_64. These packages are following the upstream
Gluster Community releases, with one minor update for each version per
month.
Users of CentOS 6 can now simply install Gluster with only these two
commands:
#
BTW, am I the only one who sees in
max_size=4294965480
almost 2^32? Could that be integer overflow?
On неділя, 24 січня 2016 р. 13:23:55 EET Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> The leak definitely remains. I did "find /mnt/volume -type d" over GlusterFS
> volume, with mentioned patches applied and with
The leak definitely remains. I did "find /mnt/volume -type d" over GlusterFS
volume, with mentioned patches applied and without "kernel notifier loop
terminated" message, but "glusterfs" process consumed ~4GiB of RAM after
"find" finished.
Here is statedump:
https://gist.github.com/10cde83c63f
When you use distributed/replicated volumes yes it is true that files
are untouched, but in case of erasure coded volume, files separated to
chunks. So there is no way you just mount and get the files...
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Mathieu Chateau
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> not sure to understand.
Hello,
not sure to understand. Gluster store files as regular ones, which is one
big difference against ceph and others that store container/blocks.
Just mount disk as normal one, your data should be there.
Cordialement,
Mathieu CHATEAU
http://www.lotp.fr
2016-01-24 11:37 GMT+01:00 Serkan Çoban
Hi,
I would like to know if it is possible to reconstruct data from an EC
volume without gluster online? If it is possible do you know any tool
that does this?
Thanks,
Serkan
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.or
Thanks for all your tests and times, it looks promising :)
Cordialement,
Mathieu CHATEAU
http://www.lotp.fr
2016-01-23 22:30 GMT+01:00 Oleksandr Natalenko :
> OK, now I'm re-performing tests with rsync + GlusterFS v3.7.6 + the
> following
> patches:
>
> ===
> Kaleb S KEITHLEY (1):
> fuse:
12 matches
Mail list logo
