Re: [Gluster-users] nfs-ganesha/pnfs read/write path on EC volume

2016-02-09 Thread Serkan Çoban
Hi Jiffin, Any update about the write path? Serkan On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote: > > > On 31/01/16 16:19, Serkan Çoban wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I am testing nfs-ganesha with pNFS on EC volume and I want to ask some >> questions. >> Assume we have two clients: c1,c2 >> a

Re: [Gluster-users] Sparse files and heal full bug fix backport to 3.6.x

2016-02-09 Thread Ravishankar N
Hi Steve, The patch already went in for 3.6.3 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187547). What version are you using? If it is 3.6.3 or newer, can you share the logs if this happens again? (or possibly try if you can reproduce the issue on your setup). Thanks, Ravi On 02/10/2016 0

[Gluster-users] samba-vfs-glusterfs deleting only metadata and not the actual folders/files

2016-02-09 Thread Jason Chang
I'm on glusterfs 3.7.6 running samba 4.1.6 with samba-vfs-glusterfs 3.7 from monotek. I have three nodes running in distributed mode. when going through cifs share provided by the module, I can create folders/files normally but when deleted through cifs share from windows, files disappears from th

Re: [Gluster-users] Sparse files and heal full bug fix backport to 3.6.x

2016-02-09 Thread FNU Raghavendra Manjunath
Adding Pranith, maintainer of the replicate feature. Regards, Raghavendra On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Steve Dainard wrote: > There is a thread from 2014 mentioning that the heal process on a > replica volume was de-sparsing sparse files.(1) > > I've been experiencing the same issue on Glu

[Gluster-users] Sparse files and heal full bug fix backport to 3.6.x

2016-02-09 Thread Steve Dainard
There is a thread from 2014 mentioning that the heal process on a replica volume was de-sparsing sparse files.(1) I've been experiencing the same issue on Gluster 3.6.x. I see there is a bug closed for a fix on Gluster 3.7 (2) and I'm wondering if this fix can be back-ported to Gluster 3.6.x? My

Re: [Gluster-users] Building 3.7.8 rpms

2016-02-09 Thread Serkan Çoban
I checkout v3.7.8 tag and rebuild the RPMs. Thanks for the answer. On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > Depends on whether the head matches or not. IIRC, Pranith has already > tagged 3.7.8, so just wait for a day or two till he announces the release, > otherwise match the head

Re: [Gluster-users] Building 3.7.8 rpms

2016-02-09 Thread Atin Mukherjee
Depends on whether the head matches or not. IIRC, Pranith has already tagged 3.7.8, so just wait for a day or two till he announces the release, otherwise match the head of your source and 3.7.8 tag. -Atin Sent from one plus one On 09-Feb-2016 11:06 pm, "Serkan Çoban" wrote: > Hi, > > I just bu

[Gluster-users] Building 3.7.8 rpms

2016-02-09 Thread Serkan Çoban
Hi, I just build 3.7.8 RPMs from git. Is is ok to install them to production? Will they be same as official 3.7.8 packages? Thanks, ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] Fail of one brick lead to crash VMs

2016-02-09 Thread FNU Raghavendra Manjunath
Hi Dominique, Thanks for the logs. I will go through the logs. I have also CCed Pranith who is the maintainer of the replicate feature. Regards, Raghavendra On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Dominique Roux wrote: > Logs are attached > > For claryfication: > vmhost1-cluster1 -> Brick 1 > vmhos

Re: [Gluster-users] Fail of one brick lead to crash VMs

2016-02-09 Thread Dominique Roux
Logs are attached For claryfication: vmhost1-cluster1 -> Brick 1 vmhost2-cluster2 -> Brick 2 entrance -> Peer Time of testing (31.01.2016 16:13) Thanks for your help Regards, Dominique Werde Teil des modernen Arbeitens im Glarnerland auf www.digitalglarus.ch! Lese Neuigkeiten auf Twitter: www

Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS behaviour on stat syscall with relatime activated

2016-02-09 Thread Simon Turcotte-Langevin
Good day to you Pranith, Once again, thank you for your time. Our use case does include a lot of small files and the read performances must not be impacted by a RELATIME-based solution. Even though this option could fix the RELATIME behavior on GlusterFS, it looks like the impact of the perform

Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS behaviour on stat syscall with relatime activated

2016-02-09 Thread Simon Turcotte-Langevin
Good day to you Pranith, Thank you for your answer, it was exactly this. However, we still have an issue with RELATIME on GlusterFS. Stating the file does not modify atime anymore, with quick-read disabled, however cat-ing the file does not replicate the atime. If I touch manually the file, th

[Gluster-users] Minutes of today's Gluster Community Bug Triage Meeting

2016-02-09 Thread Manikandan Selvaganesh
Hi all, Thanks everyone for attending the Gluster Community Bug Triage meeting today and here are the minutes of the meeting: Meeting summary --- * agenda: https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-bug-triage (Manikandan, 12:00:41) * Roll Call (Manikandan, 12:00:48) * kkeithley_ will

[Gluster-users] REMINDER: Gluster Community Bug Triage meeting at 12:00 UTC (~in 60 minutes)

2016-02-09 Thread Manikandan Selvaganesh
Hi all, This meeting is scheduled for anyone that is interested in learning more about, or assisting with the Bug Triage. Meeting details: - location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC (https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=gluster-meeting ) - date: every Tuesday - time: 12:00 UTC