Re: [Gluster-users] add/replace brick corrupting data

On 17 May 2016 at 10:02, WK wrote: > That being said, when we lose a brick, we've traditionally just live > migrated those VMs off onto other clusters because we didn't want to take > the heal hit which at best slowed down our VMs at on the pickier ones cause > them to RO out. >

Re: [Gluster-users] add/replace brick corrupting data

That should be an important clue. That being said, when we lose a brick, we've traditionally just live migrated those VMs off onto other clusters because we didn't want to take the heal hit which at best slowed down our VMs at on the pickier ones cause them to RO out. We have not yet

Re: [Gluster-users] add/replace brick corrupting data

Ok, this is probably an interesting data point. I was unable to reproduce the problem when using the fuse mount. Its late here so I might not have time to repeat with the gfapi, but I will tomorrow. On 16/05/2016 4:55 PM, Krutika Dhananjay wrote: Yes, that would probably be useful in terms

Re: [Gluster-users] add/replace brick corrupting data

Yes, that would probably be useful in terms of at least having access to the client logs. -Krutika On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Lindsay Mathieson < lindsay.mathie...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 May 2016 at 16:46, Krutika Dhananjay wrote: > > Could you share the mount

Re: [Gluster-users] add/replace brick corrupting data

Hi, Could you share the mount and glustershd logs for investigation? -Krutika On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Lindsay Mathieson < lindsay.mathie...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 15/05/2016 12:45 AM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: > > *First off I tried removing/adding a brick.* > > gluster v

Re: [Gluster-users] replace brick with brick names the same

Response inline. - Original Message - > From: "Atin Mukherjee" > To: "Lindsay Mathieson" > Cc: "gluster-users" , "Anuradha Talur" > > Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2016 8:35:38 AM >