Hi all,
About a month ago we deployed a Glusterfs 3.7.13 cluster with 6 nodes (3 x 2
replication). Suddenly since this week one node in the cluster started
reporting unsynced entries once a day. If I then run a gluster volume heal
full command the unsynced entries disappear until the next day.
Thanks Pranith,
I am waiting for RPMs to show, I will do the tests as soon as possible
and inform you.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:51 AM, Serkan Çoban
Yeah 5 MB because the VMs are serving monitoring software which doesn't do
much, but i can easily hit +250 MB of write speed in benchmark.
--
Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi
> From: gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 22:44:16 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Glu
hi all
is ctdb still needed with gluster, i just realize that dns is already round
robin? or nfs go down when one node do down? i found ctdb also going down
when one node go down, at least for a couple of minutes even with mount
errors=continue and other paramters i found here on the net..
tha
On 8/2/2016 8:14 AM, Gilberto Nunes wrote:
Hello list...
This is my first post on this list.
I have here two IBM Server, with 9 TB of hardisk on which one.
Between this servers, I have a WAN connecting two offices,let say OFFICE1
and OFFICE2.
This WAN connection is over fibre channel.
When I
i have to reboot each node to make it working with a time interval of 5-8 mins,
after that it got stable but still lots of sharding didn't heal but there's no
split-brain. some vms lost it's vmx, so i created new vm and put to the
storage to make working, wew!!!
sharding is still faulty, wo
2016-08-03 22:33 GMT+02:00 Mahdi Adnan :
> Yeah, only 3 for now running in 3 replica.
> around 5MB (900 IOps) write and 3MB (250 IOps) read and the disks are 900GB
> 10K SAS.
5MB => five megabytes/s ?
Less than an older and ancient 4x DVD reader ? Really ? Are you sure?
50VMs with five megabytes/s
my mistakes, the corruption happened after 6 hours, some vm had sharding won't
heal but there's no split brain
On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 11:13 AM, Leno Vo
wrote:
One of my gluster 3713 is on two nodes only with samsung ssd 1tb pro raid 5
x3,it already crashed two time because o
Yeah, only 3 for now running in 3 replica.around 5MB (900 IOps) write and 3MB
(250 IOps) read and the disks are 900GB 10K SAS.
--
Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi
> From: gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 22:09:59 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.7.13
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:51 AM, Serkan Çoban
> wrote:
>
>> I use rpms for installation. Redhat/Centos 6.8.
>>
>
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15084 is the patch. In some time the rpms
> will be built actually.
>
In the same
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:51 AM, Serkan Çoban wrote:
> I use rpms for installation. Redhat/Centos 6.8.
>
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15084 is the patch. In some time the rpms
will be built actually.
Use gluster volume set disperse.shd-max-threads
While testing this I thought of ways to dec
Hello,
I am planning to use snapshots on my geo-rep slave and as such wanted first to
ask if the following procedure regarding the LVM thin provisionning is correct:
Create physical volume:
pvcreate /dev/xvdb
Create volume group:
vgcreate gfs_vg /dev/xvdb
Create thin pool:
lvcreate -L 4T -T gf
2016-08-03 21:40 GMT+02:00 Mahdi Adnan :
> Hi,
>
> Currently, we have three UCS C220 M4, dual Xeon CPU (48 cores), 32GB of RAM,
> 8x900GB spindles, with Intel X520 dual 10G ports. We are planning to migrate
> more VMs and increase the number of servers in the cluster as soon as we
> figure what's g
Hi,
I'm not expert in Gluster but, i think it would be better to replace the downed
brick with a new one.Maybe start from here;
https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Managing%20Volumes/#replace-brick
--
Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 15:39:
Use replace brick commit force.
@Pranith/@Anuradha - post this will self heal be triggered automatically or
a manual trigger is needed?
On Thursday 4 August 2016, Andres E. Moya wrote:
> Does anyone else have input?
>
> we are currently only running off 1 node and one node is offline in
> repli
On 8/3/2016 11:13 AM, Leno Vo wrote:
One of my gluster 3713 is on two nodes only with samsung ssd 1tb pro raid 5
x3,it already crashed two time because of brown out and block out, it got
production vms on it, about 1.3TB.
Never got split-brain, and healed quickly. Can we say 3.7.13 two nodes
I had stability problems with centos 7.2 and gluster 3.7.11. Nodes
were crashing without any clue. I cannot find a solution and switched
to centos 6.8. All problems gone with 6.8. Maybe you can test with
centos 6.8?
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Mahdi Adnan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently, we have
Hi,
Currently, we have three UCS C220 M4, dual Xeon CPU (48 cores), 32GB of RAM,
8x900GB spindles, with Intel X520 dual 10G ports. We are planning to migrate
more VMs and increase the number of servers in the cluster as soon as we figure
what's going on with the NFS mount.
--
Respectfully
Does anyone else have input?
we are currently only running off 1 node and one node is offline in replicate
brick.
we are not experiencing any downtime because the 1 node is up.
I do not understand which is the best way to bring up a second node.
Do we just re create a file system on the no
I use rpms for installation. Redhat/Centos 6.8.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Serkan Çoban wrote:
>>
>> I prefer 3.7 if it is ok for you. Can you also provide build instructions?
>
>
> 3.7 should be fine. Do you use rpms/de
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Serkan Çoban wrote:
> I prefer 3.7 if it is ok for you. Can you also provide build instructions?
>
3.7 should be fine. Do you use rpms/debs/anything-else?
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at
I prefer 3.7 if it is ok for you. Can you also provide build instructions?
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Serkan Çoban wrote:
>>
>> Yes, but I can create 2+1(or 8+2) ec using two servers right? I have
>> 26 disks on each ser
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Serkan Çoban wrote:
> Yes, but I can create 2+1(or 8+2) ec using two servers right? I have
> 26 disks on each server.
>
On which release-branch do you want the patch? I am testing it on
master-branch now.
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Pranith Kumar Karamp
Yes, but I can create 2+1(or 8+2) ec using two servers right? I have
26 disks on each server.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Serkan Çoban wrote:
>>
>> I have two of my storage servers free, I think I can use them for
>> testi
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Serkan Çoban wrote:
> I have two of my storage servers free, I think I can use them for
> testing. Is two server testing environment ok for you?
>
I think it would be better if you have at least 3. You can test it with 2+1
ec configuration.
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2
I have two of my storage servers free, I think I can use them for
testing. Is two server testing environment ok for you?
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Serkan Çoban wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> May I ask if multi-threaded self heal
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Serkan Çoban wrote:
> Hi,
>
> May I ask if multi-threaded self heal for distributed disperse volumes
> implemented in this release?
>
Serkan,
At the moment I am a bit busy with different work, Is it possible
for you to help test the feature if I provide a
2016-08-03 17:02 GMT+02:00 Mahdi Adnan :
> the problem is, the current setup is used in a production environment, and
> switching the mount point of +50 VMs from native nfs to nfs-ganesha is not
> going to be smooth and without downtime, so i really appreciate your
> thoughts on this matter.
A li
Hi
Somebody can help???
Thanks
2016-08-02 9:14 GMT-03:00 Gilberto Nunes :
> Hello list...
> This is my first post on this list.
>
> I have here two IBM Server, with 9 TB of hardisk on which one.
> Between this servers, I have a WAN connecting two offices,let say OFFICE1
> and OFFICE2.
> This W
Hi,
Unfortunately no, but i can setup a test bench and see if it gets the same
results.
--
Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi
From: kdhan...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:59:50 +0530
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.7.13 NFS Crash
To: mahdi.ad...@outlook.com
CC: gluster-users@gl
Do you have a test case that consistently recreates this problem?
-Krutika
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Mahdi Adnan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So i have updated to 3.7.14 and i still have the same issue with NFS.
> based on what i have provided so far from logs and dumps do you think it's
> an NFS is
One of my gluster 3713 is on two nodes only with samsung ssd 1tb pro raid 5
x3,it already crashed two time because of brown out and block out, it got
production vms on it, about 1.3TB.
Never got split-brain, and healed quickly. Can we say 3.7.13 two nodes with
ssd is solid rock or just lucky?
M
Hi,
So i have updated to 3.7.14 and i still have the same issue with NFS.based on
what i have provided so far from logs and dumps do you think it's an NFS issue
? should i switch to nfs-ganesha ?
the problem is, the current setup is used in a production environment, and
switching the mount poin
On 08/03/2016 10:42 AM, Yannick Perret wrote:
> Le 03/08/2016 à 15:33, Amudhan P a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to install gluster 3.8.1 from tarball in Ubuntu 14.04.
>>
>> 1. when i run "./configure --disable-tiering" at the end showing msg
>>
>> configure: WARNING: cache variable ac_cv_build
your 10G nic is capable, the problem is the disk speed, fix ur disk speed
first, use ssd or sshd or sas 15k in a raid 0 or raid 5/6 x4 at least.
On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 2:40 AM, Kaamesh Kamalaaharan
wrote:
Hi , I have gluster 3.6.2 installed on my server network. Due to internal
Le 03/08/2016 à 15:33, Amudhan P a écrit :
Hi,
I am trying to install gluster 3.8.1 from tarball in Ubuntu 14.04.
1. when i run "./configure --disable-tiering" at the end showing msg
configure: WARNING: cache variable ac_cv_build contains a newline
configure: WARNING: cache variable ac_cv_host
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Lindsay Mathieson <
lindsay.mathie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/08/2016 10:45 PM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
>
> On 3/08/2016 2:26 PM, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
>
> Once I deleted old content from test volume it mounted to oVirt via
> storage add when previously it woul
Hi,
I am trying to install gluster 3.8.1 from tarball in Ubuntu 14.04.
1. when i run "./configure --disable-tiering" at the end showing msg
configure: WARNING: cache variable ac_cv_build contains a newline
configure: WARNING: cache variable ac_cv_host contains a newline
2. running "make" comma
We had a pretty well attended and lively meeting today, thanks to
everyone who attended.
The meeting minutes and logs are available at the links below.
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-08-03/weekly_community_meeting_03-aug-2016.2016-08-03-12.01.html
Minutes (text):
Hi,
It seems that glusterfsd reverts ownership on directories on the brick. I would
set a directory to be owned by root:root and within a half hour they are back
to the previous value. Audit logs show that glusterfsd performed the change,
thought it’s not clear if something “asked” glusterfsd t
On 3/08/2016 10:45 PM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
On 3/08/2016 2:26 PM, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
Once I deleted old content from test volume it mounted to oVirt via
storage add when previously it would error out. I am now creating a
test VM with default disk caching settings (pretty sure oVirt i
On 3/08/2016 2:26 PM, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
Once I deleted old content from test volume it mounted to oVirt via
storage add when previously it would error out. I am now creating a
test VM with default disk caching settings (pretty sure oVirt is
defaulting to none rather than writeback/throu
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Serkan Çoban wrote:
> Hi,
>
> May I ask if multi-threaded self heal for distributed disperse volumes
> implemented in this release?
AFAIK, not yet. It's not yet available on the master branch yet.
Pranith can give a better answer.
>
> Thanks,
> Serkan
>
> On Tue,
Hi,
May I ask if multi-threaded self heal for distributed disperse volumes
implemented in this release?
Thanks,
Serkan
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 5:30 PM, David Gossage
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Lindsay Mathieson
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/08/2016 5:07 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
>>>
>>> GlusterF
Hi all,
The weekly Gluster community meeting is about to take place in 30 min
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
( https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=gluster-meeting )
- date: every Wednesday
- time: 12:00 UTC
(in your terminal, run: date -d "12:
45 matches
Mail list logo
