Re: [Gluster-users] restoring a volume: best practise for backup and restore

2016-12-04 Thread Kevin Lemonnier
Fuse or not, you just can't do anything to the brick. Backup and restore the mount point (be it NFS or fuse) and everything will be fine, gluster will take care of re-distributing the files to the correct brick. No point in backuping the brick themselves by the way, keep the volume config somewh

[Gluster-users] restoring a volume: best practise for backup and restore

2016-12-04 Thread Paul Bickerstaff [DATACOM]
A search reveals little definitive in the way of best practise for backing up and restoring glusterfs volumes. I'm particularly interested in best practise for replicated volumes. Is there any recommended way that is both efficient and proven? It seems that geo-replication, snapshotting and glu

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfsd/glusterfs process taking CPU load higher than usual

2016-12-04 Thread ABHISHEK PALIWAL
its really highly appreciable if some one respond on this. On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:31 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > is there anyone who can reply on this query? > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:58 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL > wrote: > >> Please reply I am waiting for your response. >> On Nov 30, 2016 2:

[Gluster-users] Assertion failed: lru_inode_ctx->block_num > 0

2016-12-04 Thread qingwei wei
Hi, I encountered this when i do the FIO random write on the fuse mount gluster volume. After this assertion happen, the client log is filled with pending frames messages and FIO just show zero IO in the progress status. As i leave this test to run overnight, the client log file fill up with those

[Gluster-users] GNU TAR - file changed as we read it

2016-12-04 Thread Pablo J Rebollo Sosa
Hi all, I upgraded Gluster servers and clients to 3.8.5 but still getting "file changed as we read it” when using tar (GNU tar). The upgrade to 3.8.5 was performed following the “online upgrade procedure”. My current configuration: - CentOS 7.2 64bits - Gluster 3.8.5 from RP