ERATA:
less than 4 GB RAM.
RAM < 4 GB , SWAP = RAM * 2
RAM > 4 GB, SWAP = RAM + 2 GB
On 2/7/2017 5:37 PM, Cedric Lemarchand wrote:
> Hum ... I would say that ram is really expensive right now !
> In response to the OP, an old rule was to provision double ram as swap,
> actually you could put th
Hi All,
Using 'configure --disable-events` fixes above problem.
Thank you, Niklas for forwarding this info.
regards
Amudhan
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Amudhan P wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Did anyone faced below issue in installing 3.9.0 using source tar file in
> Ubuntu.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec
That old rule applied to machines with less than 2 GB RAM. :))
RAM < 2 GB , SWAP = RAM * 2
RAM > 2 GB, SWAP = RAM + 2 GB
OP should be fine with 16 GB of SWAP for a machine with 128 GB RAM.
Cheers.
On 2/7/2017 5:37 PM, Cedric Lemarchand wrote:
> Hum ... I would say that ram is really expensive
- Original Message -
From: "lejeczek"
To: "Nag Pavan Chilakam"
Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Wednesday, 8 February, 2017 7:15:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Input/output error - would not heal
On 08/02/17 06:11, Nag Pavan Chilakam wrote:
> "gluster volume info" and "gluster
Hey guys,
Any ideas?
[root@v0 ~]# gluster volume start data2
volume start: data2: failed: Volume id mismatch for brick
s0:/run/gluster/snaps/data2/brick1/data/brick. Expected volume id
d8b0a411-70d9-454d-b5fb-7d7ca424adf2, volume id
a7eae608-f1c4-44fd-a6aa-5b9c19e13565
found
[root@v0 ~]# gluster
Dear Ted and Ashish
Thanks for your helpful response. Unfortunately I’m running the epel version
for my SL6.8 distro so that’s 3.7.
So, I’ve tried to remove the bad brick. (I am running a 3x2 system), but I get
the following error
gluster volume remove-brick A01 replica 1 m55:/export/brickA
Hi,
New to Gluster too. I welcome the more experienced users to correct me
if I'm wrong.
Based on some quick tests in my environment, it works like this:
a) The following creates a replicated (replica count = 2),
non-distributed volume
gluster volume create replicated_but_not_distributed replic
On 08/02/17 06:11, Nag Pavan Chilakam wrote:
"gluster volume info" and "gluster vol status" would help in us debug faster.
However, coming to gfid mismatch, yes the file "abbreviations.log" (I assume the other brick copy
also to be " abbreviations.log" and not "breviations.log" typo mista
Distributed is the default, and replicated distributes as long as there are
at least twice the number of bricks as your replication level.
For example...
gluster volume create gv0 server1:/data/brick1/gv0 server2:/data/brick1/gv0
server3:/data/brick1/gv0
...distributes files across all three serv
For _every_ file copied samba performs readdir() to get all entries of the
destination folder. Then the list is searched for filename (to prevent name
collisions as SMB shares are not case sensitive). More files in folder, more
time it takes to perform readdir(). It is a lot worse for Gluster be
Thanks for the reply
I've just done a bit more testing. If I use rsync from a gluster client to
copy the same files to the mount point it only takes a couple of minutes.
For some reason it's very slow on samba though (version 4.4.4).
I have tried various samba tweaks / settings and have yet to ge
Hi lejeczek,
Try stop force.
gluster vol geo-rep :: stop force
Thanks and Regards,
Kotresh H R
Thanks and Regards,
Kotresh H R
- Original Message -
> From: "lejeczek"
> To: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar"
> Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 3:42:18 PM
>
Hi,
There is a number of tweaks/hacks to make it better, but IMHO overall
performance with small files is still unacceptable for such folders with
thousands of entries.
If your shares are not too large to be placed on single filesystem and you
still want to use Gluster - it is possible to run
On 07/02/17 17:29, Olivier Lambert wrote:
Yep, but if I hit a 30% penalty, I don't want that :) Any idea of the
perf impact? I'll probably contact Xavier directly if he's not here!
It depends on the workload. The basic problem is that the I/O write size
must be a multiple of the number of data
Hi Pavan,
On 07/02/17 14:51, Nag Pavan Chilakam wrote:
You can always go for x3(3 replica copies), to address your need which you have
asked
EC volumes can be seen as raid for understanding purpose, but don't see it as
an apple-to-apple comparison.
Raid4/6(mostly) relies on XOR'ing bits(so bas
Hi,
I'm new to Gluster so a very basic question. Are all volumes distributed by
default? Is there a switch to turn this feature on/off?
I ask this because in an intro to Gluster I saw "Replicated Volume" and
"Distributed Replicated Volume". Is the first type, "Replicated Volume", not
distrib
Hi Olivier,
sorry, didn't see the email earlier...
We've already talked about this in private, but to make things clearer
to everyone I answer here.
On 07/02/17 14:16, Olivier Lambert wrote:
Hi everyone!
I'm currently working on implementing Gluster on XenServer/Xen Orchestra.
I want to ex
Hi
I am currently testing gluster 3.9 replicated/distrbuted on centos 7.3 with
samba/ctdb.
I have been able to get it all up and running, but writing small files is
really slow.
If I copy large files from gluster backed samba I get almost wire speed (We
only have 1Gb at the moment). I get around
18 matches
Mail list logo
