On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:48 AM, dev wrote:
> I'm trying to setup SSL transport with glusterfs following the guide
> here: http://blog.gluster.org/author/zbyszek/
>
> I've copied the resulting ca, pem and key files to my server
> (to /etc/ssl) as well as a copy on my gluster client. The link
> abo
Hello,
Does anyone have a working setup of GlusterFS on Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS using
Infiniband & RDMA ?
I am planning to use Infiniband(IPoIB) for Cluster-Interconnect & how would
RMDA be configured. Any info is appreciated.
--
Deepak
-
I'm trying to setup SSL transport with glusterfs following the guide
here: http://blog.gluster.org/author/zbyszek/
I've copied the resulting ca, pem and key files to my server
(to /etc/ssl) as well as a copy on my gluster client. The link
above does not explain the proper mount options for mountin
Hi,
We are evaluating dell DSS7000 chassis with 90 disks.
Has anyone used that much brick per server?
Any suggestions, advices?
Thanks,
Serkan
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-use
Hello Gluster-Community,
we want to make some Performance Tests with Gluster (4 Nodes, also with HA) and
now there is a discussion about the hardware configuration.
Are there any experiences concerning this? It is better to have more CPU-Cores
OR higher CPU-Rate OR more RAM?
AFAIK the brick pro
Hello,
I have a gluster volume on 3.8.8 which has multiple volumes, each on
distributed/replicated on 5 servers (2 replicas+1 quorum); each volume is both
accessed as gluster client (RW, clients have 3.8.8 or 3.8.5) or Ganesha FS (RO).
On one of the volumes we have:
- cluster.data-self-heal-
Hey guys,
I keep seeing different recommendations for the best shard sizes for VM
images, from 64MB to 512MB.
What's the benefit of smaller v larger shards?
I'm guessing smaller shards are quicker to heal, but larger shards will
provide better sequential I/O for single clients? Anything else?
I
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 02:53:26PM +0100, Pavel Szalbot wrote:
> Hi, tested it with 3.8.8 on client (CentOS) and server (Ubuntu) and
> everything is OK now.
Awesome, many thanks for testing and reporting back the results.
Niels
>
> -ps
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Pavel Szalbot
> wr
Hi, tested it with 3.8.8 on client (CentOS) and server (Ubuntu) and
everything is OK now.
-ps
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Pavel Szalbot
wrote:
> Hi Daryl,
>
> I must have missed your reply and found out about it when reading about
> 3.8.9 and searching in gluster-users history.
>
> I will
Hi Daryl,
I must have missed your reply and found out about it when reading about
3.8.9 and searching in gluster-users history.
I will test the same setup with gluster 3.8.8 i.e. libvirt
2.0.0-10.el7_3.4, glusterfs 3.8.8-1.el7 and gluster 3.8.8 on servers
(Ubuntu) and let you know.
This is libvi
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:00:18AM -0800, Daryl lee wrote:
> Niels,
> Thanks for submitting the GlusterFS 3.8.9 package to the testing repo. I
> have my testing feedback to provide but I'm not sure where you want me to
> post this (should I subscribe to the package mailing list and post it
> there
11 matches
Mail list logo