[Gluster-users] peer probe failures

Hey all, I've got a strange problem going on here. I've installed glusterfs-server on ubuntu 16.04: glusterfs-client/xenial,now 3.7.6-1ubuntu1 amd64 [installed,automatic] glusterfs-common/xenial,now 3.7.6-1ubuntu1 amd64 [installed,automatic] glusterfs-server/xenial,now 3.7.6-1ubuntu1 amd64

[Gluster-users] Special Config or not Possible (5 bricks)

Hi, i have 5 DIsks (3 3 TB, 2 3 TB) Actual running Raid 5 on the 3 3 TB Disks and Raid 1 on the 3 TB DIsks (dont diskuss about Raid 5 .. i know it :) Plan was to use gluster with sharding enabled replica 3 on all 5 disks so parts of the File are at minimum of 3 disks (localy make 5 bricks ...)

[Gluster-users] Working and up to date guide for ganesha ? nfs-ganesha gluster-ganesha

Hello, I've tried all the guides I can find. The is alot of descrepency on the ganesha.conf file and how it interacts with gluster. none of the examples I found worked, also none of them have been updated in the last year or so, even Redhat's. any one have a link to a working guide for ganesha?

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster Performance in an Ovirt Scenario.

You didn’t list your mount type for test 1, but it sounds like your NFS mounting your storage. Is this a “standard” OS level NFS server, or a Ganesha based NFS server? If you’re using “normal” NFS, your nodes write to 1 of your gluster servers over the NFS mount, and the gluster server will

[Gluster-users] Gluster Performance in an Ovirt Scenario.

On my side in has a productive Ovirt Cluster and try to understand my performance issue. For history information, I start with Ovirt 3.6 and gluster 3.6 and the test are near the same over the version. My understanding problem is that if a oivrt server write in an disperse scenario to 4 (6)

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.8.10 rebalance VMs corruption

Good to hear. Eagerly waiting for the patch. Thank you guys. Get Outlook for Android From: Krutika Dhananjay Sent: Monday, April 3, 2017 11:22:40 AM To: Pranith Kumar Karampuri Cc: Mahdi Adnan;

[Gluster-users] Performance testing

Hi All, I build a Gluster 3.8.4 (RHGS 3.2) cluster for a customer, and I am having some issue demonstrating that it performs well. The customer compares it with his old NFS based NAS, and runs FIO to test workloads. What I notice is that FIO throughtput is only +-20Mb/s, which is not a lot.

Re: [Gluster-users] adding arbiter

Il 01/04/2017 04:22, Gambit15 ha scritto: > As I understand it, only new files will be sharded, but simply > renaming or moving them may be enough in that case. > > I'm interested in the arbiter/sharding bug you've mentioned. Could you > provide any more details or a link? > I think it is

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.8.10 rebalance VMs corruption

This is a good news Is this related to the previously fixed bug? Il 3 apr 2017 10:22 AM, "Krutika Dhananjay" ha scritto: > So Raghavendra has an RCA for this issue. > > Copy-pasting his comment here: > > > > Following is a rough algorithm of shard_writev: > > 1. Based on

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.8.10 rebalance VMs corruption

So Raghavendra has an RCA for this issue. Copy-pasting his comment here: Following is a rough algorithm of shard_writev: 1. Based on the offset, calculate the shards touched by current write. 2. Look for inodes corresponding to these shard files in itable. 3. If one or more inodes are missing