Hello, everyone,
I am installing glusterfs release 3.8.11 now on my aarch64 computer. It will
fail in execute configure.
[cid:0c2c69f8-aaad-400a-b0b8-9635f173ed31]
Configure file is this:
[cid:2ccf15ef-5d33-4dd5-ab15-81003c863878]
I think architectures result in this error because on my x86_
> We build the GlusterFS packages against the current version of CentOS
7.
> The dependencies that are installed during the package building may
not be
> correct for older CentOS versions. There is no guarantee that the
compiled
> binaries work correctly on previous versions. The backwards
compatib
Thank you very much.
--
Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi
From: Karthik Subrahmanya
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 4:30:30 PM
To: Mahdi Adnan
Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Replica 2 Quorum and arbiter
Hi,
Comments inline.
On Tue, Apr 1
Use the latest 3.8.x though for doing this process. I remember there was
some performance issue with arbtier+sharding which is fixed in latest 3.8.x
release.
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Ravishankar N
wrote:
> On 04/22/2017 12:54 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>
> Also, can we add an arb
In EC if you have m+n configuration, you have to grow by m+n bricks.
If you have 6+2 you need to add another 8 bricks.
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta
wrote:
> I'm still trying to figure out if adding a single server to an
> existing gluster cluster is possible or not, base
I'm still trying to figure out if adding a single server to an
existing gluster cluster is possible or not, based on EC or standard
replica.
I don't think so, because with replica 3, when each server is already
full (no more slots for disks), I need to add 3 server at once.
Is this the same even
On 04/22/2017 12:54 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
Also, can we add an arbiter node to the current replica 2
volume without losing data ? if yes, does the re-balance bug
"Bug 1440635" affect this process ?
I remember we had one user in Redhat who wanted to do the sa
Hi,
I can't talk about performances on newer versions, but as of gluster
3.7 / 3.8, performances for small files (like a website) are pretty bad.
It does work well though as long as you configure OPCache to keep
everything in memory (bump the cache size and disable stat).
As for storing a disk on
Thank you very much.
--
Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi
From: Karthik Subrahmanya
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 4:30:30 PM
To: Mahdi Adnan
Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Replica 2 Quorum and arbiter
Hi,
Comments inline.
On Tue, Apr 1
Thanks for the precisions regarding the healing during the online upgrade
procedure. To be on the safe side I will follow the offline upgrade procedure.
I am indeed using replication with two nodes.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Bugfix release GlusterFS 3.8.11 h
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
> We are evolving a document to answer this question, the wip document is at
> https://github.com/karthik-us/glusterdocs/blob/
> 1c97001d482923c2e6a9c566b3faf89d0c32b269/Administrator%
> 20Guide/Split%20brain%2
We are evolving a document to answer this question, the wip document is at
https://github.com/karthik-us/glusterdocs/blob/1c97001d482923c2e6a9c566b3faf89d0c32b269/Administrator%20Guide/Split%20brain%20and%20ways%20to%20deal%20with%20it.md
Let us know if you still have doubts after reading this.
O
If your volume has replication/erasure coding then it is mandatory.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:05 AM, mabi wrote:
> Thanks for pointing me to the documentation. That's perfect, I can now
> plan my upgrade to 3.8.11. By the way I was wondering why is a self-heal
> part of the upgrade procedure? Is
+Kotresh who seems to have worked on the bug you mentioned.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:21 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL
wrote:
>
> If the patch provided in that case will resolve my bug as well then please
> provide the patch so that I will backport it on 3.7.6
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:30 AM, ABHIS
14 matches
Mail list logo