Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Announcing release 3.11 : Scope, schedule and feature tracking

On 04/25/2017 10:08 AM, Shyam wrote: On 04/25/2017 07:40 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Shyam > wrote: On 02/28/2017 10:17 AM, Shyam wrote: 1) Halo - Initial Cut (@pranith) Sorry for the delay

Re: [Gluster-users] Cluster management

Here's the basic concept behind what my answer would be if I wasn't short on time: https://joejulian.name/blog/how-to-expand-glusterfs-replicated-clusters-by-one-server/ On 04/25/17 14:09, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: Sorrt for the stupid subject and for questions that probably should be

Re: [Gluster-users] Cluster management

> 1) can I add a fourth server, with one brick, increasing the total > available space? If yes, how? No > > 2) can I increase replica count from 3 to 4 ? Yes > > 3) can I decrease replica count from 3 to 2 ? Yes > > 4) can I move from a replicated volume to a distributed replicated volume

[Gluster-users] Cluster management

Sorrt for the stupid subject and for questions that probably should be pleaced in FAQ page, but, let's assume a replica 3 cluster made with 3 servers (1 brick per server) 1) can I add a fourth server, with one brick, increasing the total available space? If yes, how? 2) can I increase replica

[Gluster-users] OOM Kills glustershd process in 3.10.1

Yes, I have enabled bitrot process and it's currently running signer process in some nodes. Disabling and enabling bitrot doesn't makes difference it will start crawl process again right. On Tuesday, April 25, 2017, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:22

Re: [Gluster-users] OOM Kills glustershd process in 3.10.1

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Amudhan P wrote: > Hi Pranith, > > if I restart glusterd service in the node alone will it work. bcoz I feel > that doing volume force start will trigger bitrot process to crawl disks in > all nodes. > Have you enabled bitrot? If not then

Re: [Gluster-users] OOM Kills glustershd process in 3.10.1

Hi Pranith, if I restart glusterd service in the node alone will it work. bcoz I feel that doing volume force start will trigger bitrot process to crawl disks in all nodes. yes, rebalance fix layout is on process. regards Amudhan On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Announcing release 3.11 : Scope, schedule and feature tracking

On 04/20/2017 02:46 AM, Kaushal M wrote: 2) IPv6 support (@kaushal) This is under review at https://review.gluster.org/16228 . The patch mostly looks fine. The only issue is that it currently depends and links with an internal FB fork of tirpc (mainly for some helper functions and utilities).

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Announcing release 3.11 : Scope, schedule and feature tracking

On 04/25/2017 07:40 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Shyam > wrote: On 02/28/2017 10:17 AM, Shyam wrote: 1) Halo - Initial Cut (@pranith) Sorry for the delay in response. Due to some other work

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Announcing release 3.11 : Scope, schedule and feature tracking

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Shyam wrote: > On 02/28/2017 10:17 AM, Shyam wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> With release 3.10 shipped [1], it is time to set the dates for release >> 3.11 (and subsequently 4.0). >> >> This mail has the following sections, so please read or revisit as

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Announcing release 3.11 : Scope, schedule and feature tracking

Hi Serkan, Even though bitrot is not enabled, versioning was being done. As part of it, on every fresh lookup, getxattr calls were made to find weather object is bad, to get it's current version and signature. So a find on gluster mount sometimes would cause high cpu utilization. Since this is

Re: [Gluster-users] slow write perf for disperse volume

2017-04-25 9:03 GMT+02:00 Xavier Hernandez : > Hi Ingard, > > On 24/04/17 14:43, Ingard Mevåg wrote: > >> I've done some more testing with tc and introduced latency on one of my >> testservers. With 9ms latency artificially introduced using tc ( sudo tc >> qdisc add dev

Re: [Gluster-users] Debian repos no longer on download.gluster.org?

Am 24.04.2017 um 16:16 schrieb Thomas Bätzler: > I'm only getting 404's when trying to access the debian repos on > download.gluster.org. Did they move someplace else, or is there some > other reason why they're not available? You should post the URI of your try. For me follwing URI works:

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Announcing release 3.11 : Scope, schedule and feature tracking

How this affect CPU usage? Does it read whole file and calculates a hash after it is being written? Will this patch land in 3.10.x? On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar wrote: > Hi > > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/188 is merged in

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Announcing release 3.11 : Scope, schedule and feature tracking

Hi https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/188 is merged in master and needs to go in 3.11 Thanks and Regards, Kotresh H R - Original Message - > From: "Kaushal M" > To: "Shyam" > Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org, "Gluster Devel"

Re: [Gluster-users] High load on glusterfsd process

Thanks Kotresh. Let me discuss in my team and will let you know. Regards, Abhishek On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar < khire...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Abhishek, > > As this is an enhancement it won't be back ported to 3.7/3.8/3.10 > It would be only available from

Re: [Gluster-users] slow write perf for disperse volume

Hi Ingard, On 24/04/17 14:43, Ingard Mevåg wrote: I've done some more testing with tc and introduced latency on one of my testservers. With 9ms latency artificially introduced using tc ( sudo tc qdisc add dev bond0 root netem delay 9ms ) to a testserver in the same DC as the disperse volume

Re: [Gluster-users] High load on glusterfsd process

Hi Abhishek, As this is an enhancement it won't be back ported to 3.7/3.8/3.10 It would be only available from upcoming 3.11 release. But I did try applying it to 3.7.6. It has lot of conflicts. If it's important for you, you can upgrade to latest version. available and back port it. If it's

[Gluster-users] Memory Consumption Process nfs by Gluster

Hello everyone, Currently one of the production gluster nodes is consuming a lot of memory, in particular the gluster NFS process makes great use of SWAP memory and does not release it. It happens to someone else? # for file in /proc/*/status ; do awk '/VmSwap|Name|Pid/{printf $2 " "