Re: [Gluster-users] Urgent :) Procedure for replacing Gluster Node on 3.8.12

2017-06-08 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
On 9 June 2017 at 10:51, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: > Or I should say we *had* a 3 node cluster, one node died today. Boot SSD failed, definitely a reinstall from scratch. And a big thanks (*not*) to the smart reporting which showed no issues at all. -- Lindsay

[Gluster-users] Urgent :) Procedure for replacing Gluster Node on 3.8.12

2017-06-08 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
Status: We have a 3 node gluster cluster (proxmox based) - gluster 3.8.12 - Replica 3 - VM Hosting Only - Sharded Storage Or I should say we *had* a 3 node cluster, one node died today. Possibly I can recover it, in whcih case no issues, we just let it heal itself. For now its running happily on

Re: [Gluster-users] Files Missing on Client Side; Still available on bricks

2017-06-08 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
+Raghavendra/Nithya On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Jarsulic, Michael [CRI] < mjarsu...@bsd.uchicago.edu> wrote: > Hello, > > I am still working at recovering from a few failed OS hard drives on my > gluster storage and have been removing, and re-adding bricks quite a bit. I > noticed yesterday

Re: [Gluster-users] ?==?utf-8?q? Heal operation detail of EC volumes

2017-06-08 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
This mail was not there in the same thread as earlier because the subject has extra "?==?utf-8?q? " so thought it was not answered and answered again. Sorry about that. On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 1:45 AM, Xavier Hernandez wrote: > Hi Serkan, > > On Thursday, June 01, 2017

Re: [Gluster-users] Heal operation detail of EC volumes

2017-06-08 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Serkan Çoban > wrote: > >> >Is it possible that this matches your observations ? >> Yes that matches what I see. So 19 files is being in parallel by

Re: [Gluster-users] Heal operation detail of EC volumes

2017-06-08 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Serkan Çoban wrote: > >Is it possible that this matches your observations ? > Yes that matches what I see. So 19 files is being in parallel by 19 > SHD processes. I thought only one file is being healed at a time. > Then what is the meaning