Re: [Gluster-users] Rebalance without changing layout

2017-06-21 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
- Original Message - > From: "Tahereh Fattahi" > To: gluster-users@gluster.org > Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 12:21:53 AM > Subject: [Gluster-users] Rebalance without changing layout > > Hi > Is it possible to rebalance data in gluster without changing layout? > When I use rebalance with

[Gluster-users] Gluster failure due to "0-management: Lock not released for "

2017-06-21 Thread Victor Nomura
Hi All, I'm fairly new to Gluster (3.10.3) and got it going for a couple of months now but suddenly after a power failure in our building it all came crashing down. No client is able to connect after powering back the 3 nodes I have setup. Looking at the logs, it looks like there's some so

[Gluster-users] Community Meeting minutes, 2017-06-21

2017-06-21 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
=== #gluster-meeting: Gluster Community Meeting === Meeting started by kkeithley at 15:13:53 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2017-06-21/gluster_community_meeting.2

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 3.11.1: Scheduled for 20th of June

2017-06-21 Thread Shyam
On 06/21/2017 11:37 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Shyam mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi, Release tagging has been postponed by a day to accommodate a fix for a regression that has been introduced between 3.11.0 and 3.11.1 (see [1] f

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 3.11.1: Scheduled for 20th of June

2017-06-21 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Shyam wrote: > Hi, > > Release tagging has been postponed by a day to accommodate a fix for a > regression that has been introduced between 3.11.0 and 3.11.1 (see [1] for > details). > > As a result 3.11.1 will be tagged on the 21st June as of now (further > delay

Re: [Gluster-users] [ovirt-users] Very poor GlusterFS performance

2017-06-21 Thread Krutika Dhananjay
No, you don't need to do any of that. Just executing volume-set commands is sufficient for the changes to take effect. -Krutika On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Chris Boot wrote: > [replying to lists this time] > > On 20/06/17 11:23, Krutika Dhananjay wrote: > > Couple of things: > > > > 1. Li

Re: [Gluster-users] [ovirt-users] Very poor GlusterFS performance

2017-06-21 Thread Krutika Dhananjay
No. It's just that in the internal testing that was done here, increasing the thread count beyond 4 did not improve the performance any further. -Krutika On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:30 PM, mabi wrote: > Dear Krutika, > > Sorry for asking so naively but can you tell me on what factor do you base