I'm on 3.10.5. Its rock solid (at least with the fuse mount )
We are also typically on a somewhat slower GlusterFS LAN network (bonded
2x1G, jumbo frames) so that may be a factor.
I'll try to setup a trusted pool to test libgfapi soon.
I'm curious as to how much faster it is, but the fuse
Mh, not so sure really, using libgfapi and it's been working perfectly
fine. And trust me, there had been A LOT of various crashes, reboots and
kill of nodes.
Maybe it's a version thing ? A new bug in the new gluster releases that
doesn't affect our 3.7.15.
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 10:19:24AM
On 9/8/2017 11:05 PM, Pavel Szalbot wrote:
When we return the c1g node, we do see a "pause" in the VMs as the shards
heal. By pause meaning a terminal session gets spongy, but that passes
pretty quickly.
Hmm, do you see any errors in VM's dmesg? Or any other reasons for "sponginess"?
No,
Well, that makes me feel better.
I've seen all these stories here and on Ovirt recently about VMs going
read-only, even on fairly simply layouts.
Each time, I've responded that we just don't see those issues.
I guess the fact that we were lazy about switching to gfapi turns out to
be a
Yes, this is my observation so far.
On Sep 9, 2017 13:32, "Gionatan Danti" wrote:
> Il 09-09-2017 09:09 Pavel Szalbot ha scritto:
>
>> Sorry, I did not start the glusterfsd on the node I was shutting
>> yesterday and now killed another one during FUSE test, so it had to
>>
Il 09-09-2017 09:09 Pavel Szalbot ha scritto:
Sorry, I did not start the glusterfsd on the node I was shutting
yesterday and now killed another one during FUSE test, so it had to
crash immediately (only one of three nodes were actually up). This
definitely happened for the first time (only one
Sorry, I did not start the glusterfsd on the node I was shutting
yesterday and now killed another one during FUSE test, so it had to
crash immediately (only one of three nodes were actually up). This
definitely happened for the first time (only one node had been killed
yesterday).
Using FUSE
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:35 AM, WK wrote:
> Pavel.
>
> Is there a difference between native client (fuse) and libgfapi in regards
> to the crashing/read-only behaviour?
I switched to FUSE now and the VM crashed (read-only remount)
immediately after one node started