Hey,
Sorry for the late reply.
Why have you provided the same bricks for replica and disperse volume?
--
Ashish
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Fite"
To: gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 2:21:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Wrong volume size with df
I'm also having this issue with a volume before and after I broke from a
arbiter volume down to a single distribute, and rebuilt to arbiter
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Tom Fite wrote:
> For what it's worth here, after I added a hot tier to the pool, the brick
> sizes are now reporting the co
>From Karan:
> We had a similar issue when we were certifying gluster + milestone. But
the issue got resolved when we disabled readdir-ahead. Looks like the
>issue is in readdir code path.
Paul, can you try turning off performance.readdir-ahead and see if the
issue persists?
On 29 December 20
On 01/04/2018 12:58 PM, WK wrote:
> I'm reading that the new kernel will slow down context switches. That is
> of course a big deal with FUSE mounts.
>
> Has anybody installed the new kernels yet and observed any performance
> degradation?
We are in the process of testing the same out. Hopefully
I'm reading that the new kernel will slow down context switches. That is
of course a big deal with FUSE mounts.
Has anybody installed the new kernels yet and observed any performance
degradation?
-wk
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gl