Re: [Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

On 2018-03-06, Amar Tumballi wrote: >> If anyone would like our test scripts, I can either tar them up and >> email them or put them in github - either is fine with me. (they rely >> on current builds of docker and docker-compose) >> >> > Sure, sharing the test cases makes it

Re: [Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

Adding csaba On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > +Csaba. > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:52 AM, Paul Anderson wrote: > >> Raghavendra, >> >> Thanks very much for your reply. >> >> I fixed our data corruption problem by disabling the

Re: [Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

+Csaba. On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:52 AM, Paul Anderson wrote: > Raghavendra, > > Thanks very much for your reply. > > I fixed our data corruption problem by disabling the volume > performance.write-behind flag as you suggested, and simultaneously > disabling caching in my client

Re: [Gluster-users] Fixing a rejected peer

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 6:00 AM, Jamie Lawrence wrote: > Hello, > > So I'm seeing a rejected peer with 3.12.6. This is with a replica 3 volume. > > It actually began as the same problem with a different peer. I noticed > with (call it) gluster-2, when I couldn't make a

Re: [Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

Tough to do. Like in my case where you would have to install and use Plex. On March 5, 2018 4:19:23 PM PST, Amar Tumballi wrote: >> >> >> If anyone would like our test scripts, I can either tar them up and >> email them or put them in github - either is fine with me. (they

[Gluster-users] Fixing a rejected peer

Hello, So I'm seeing a rejected peer with 3.12.6. This is with a replica 3 volume. It actually began as the same problem with a different peer. I noticed with (call it) gluster-2, when I couldn't make a new volume. I compared /var/lib/glusterd between them, and found that somehow the options

Re: [Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

> > > If anyone would like our test scripts, I can either tar them up and > email them or put them in github - either is fine with me. (they rely > on current builds of docker and docker-compose) > > Sure, sharing the test cases makes it very easy for us to see what would be the issue. I would

Re: [Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

Raghavendra, Thanks very much for your reply. I fixed our data corruption problem by disabling the volume performance.write-behind flag as you suggested, and simultaneously disabling caching in my client side mount command. In very modest testing, the flock() case appears to me to work well -

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.0: RC1 tagged

Hi Shyam, 2018-03-01 22:08 GMT-03:00 Shyam Ranganathan : > On 02/28/2018 07:25 AM, Javier Romero wrote: >> This one fails >> http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1548/311548/centos-release-gluster40-0.9-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm >> >> # yum install -y >>

Re: [Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 8:21 PM, Paul Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > tl;dr summary of below: flock() works, but what does it take to make > sync()/fsync() work in a 3 node GFS cluster? > > I am under the impression that POSIX flock, POSIX > fcntl(F_SETLK/F_GETLK,...), and POSIX

[Gluster-users] SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?

Hi, tl;dr summary of below: flock() works, but what does it take to make sync()/fsync() work in a 3 node GFS cluster? I am under the impression that POSIX flock, POSIX fcntl(F_SETLK/F_GETLK,...), and POSIX read/write/sync/fsync are all supported in cluster operations, such that in theory,

Re: [Gluster-users] Why files goes to hot tier and cold tier at same time

Hi, The actual data will be in the hot tier only till demotion. The file that you see on the cold tier is just a linkto file of the file on the hot tier. These linkto file are necessary for the internal working of the tier. On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:16 PM, Sherin George

Re: [Gluster-users] tiering

Hi, There isn't a way to replace the failing tier brick through a single command as we don't have support for replace/ remove or add brick with tier. Once you bring the brick online(volume start force), the data in the brick will be built by the self heal daemon (Done because its a replicated

[Gluster-users] Why files goes to hot tier and cold tier at same time

Hi Guys Got a quick question regarding hot tier and cold tier. I got a gluster volume with 1 x 3 hot tier and 1 x 3 cold tier. watermark-low is 75 and watermark-hi is 90. usage of volume is very less. My files always go to hot tier and cold tier at same time As I understand, data should go to hot

[Gluster-users] Release 3.12.7: Scheduled for the 8th of March

Hi, It's time to prepare the 3.12.7 release, which falls on the 10th of each month, and hence would be 08-03-2018 this time around. This mail is to call out the following, 1) Are there any pending *blocker* bugs that need to be tracked for 3.12.7? If so mark them against the provided tracker