Hi Raghavendra,
i'll try to gather the information you need, hopefully this weekend.
One thing i've done this week: deactivate performance.quick-read
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673058), which
(according to munin) ended in a massive drop in network traffic and a
slightly lower i
Hello Gluster users,
As you all aware that glusterfs-6 is out, we would like to inform you
that, we have spent a significant amount of time in testing
glusterfs-6 in upgrade scenarios. We have done upgrade testing to
glusterfs-6 from various releases like 3.12, 4.1 and 5.3.
As glusterfs-6 has got
+Gluster-users
Sorry about the delay. There is nothing suspicious about per thread CPU
utilization of glusterfs process. However looking at the volume profile
attached I see huge number of lookups. I think if we cutdown the number of
lookups probably we'll see improvements in performance. I need
Hi,
If you know which directories are problematic, please check and see if the
permissions on them are correct on the individual bricks.
Please also provide the following:
- *gluster volume info* for the volume
- The gluster version you are running
regards,
Nithya
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at
2 editions of DevConf have their CfPs open
[1] DevConf India : https://devconf.info/in (event dates 02, 03 Aug
2019, Bengaluru)
[2] DevConf USA : https://devconf.info/us/ (event dates 15 -17 Aug,
2019, Boston)
The DevConf events are well curated to get a good mix of developers
and users. This not
Hi,
In my glusterd.log i am seeing this error message , is this related to the
patch i applied? or do i need to open a new thread?
I [MSGID: 106327] [glusterd-geo-rep.c:4483:glusterd_read_status_file]
0-management: Using passed config
template(/var/lib/glusterd/geo-replication/vol_75a5fd373d88ba
On 3/27/19 7:39 PM, Alexey Talikov wrote:
I have two clusters with dispersed volumes (2+1) with GEO replication
It works fine till I use glusterfs-fuse, but as even one file written
over nfs-ganesha replication goes to Fault and recovers after I remove
this file (sometimes after stop/start)
On 2/8/19 11:53 AM, Soumya Koduri wrote:
On 2/8/19 3:20 AM, Maurits Lamers wrote:
Hi,
[2019-02-07 10:11:24.812606] E [MSGID: 104055]
[glfs-fops.c:4955:glfs_cbk_upcall_data] 0-gfapi: Synctak for Upcall
event_type(1) and gfid(yøêÙ
MzîSL4_@) failed
[2019-02-07 10:11:24.819376]
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 20:27, Poornima Gurusiddaiah
wrote:
> This feature is not under active development as it was not used widely.
> AFAIK its not supported feature.
> +Nithya +Raghavendra for further clarifications.
>
This is not actively supported - there has been no work done on this
featu
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:37 PM Xavi Hernandez wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 3:05 AM Raghavendra Gowdappa
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 8:38 PM Xavi Hernandez
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 2:20 PM Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
>>> pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 3:05 AM Raghavendra Gowdappa
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 8:38 PM Xavi Hernandez
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 2:20 PM Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
>> pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:38 PM Xavi Hernandez
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>
11 matches
Mail list logo
