Am Mo., 27. Dez. 2021 um 16:25 Uhr schrieb Nikhil Ladha :
>
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 7:24 PM Michael Böhm
> wrote:
>
>> Am Mo., 27. Dez. 2021 um 14:04 Uhr schrieb Nikhil Ladha <
>> nla...@redhat.com>:
>>
>>> Hi Michael
>>>
>>> I think you are hitting a similar issue like this one
>>> https://git
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 8:32 PM Ingo Fischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in former releases like 9.x there was alwys a "major issues" section in
> the release notes like
> https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/release-notes/9.0/#major-issues
> 8especially in ".0" releases. Should this not be added to such a se
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 7:24 PM Michael Böhm
wrote:
> Am Mo., 27. Dez. 2021 um 14:04 Uhr schrieb Nikhil Ladha >:
>
>> Hi Michael
>>
>> I think you are hitting a similar issue like this one
>> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/3066.
>> If so, the fix for the same is under review and cou
Hi,
in former releases like 9.x there was alwys a "major issues" section in
the release notes like
https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/release-notes/9.0/#major-issues
8especially in ".0" releases. Should this not be added to such a section
in the 10.0 release notes to inform users that want to
Am Mo., 27. Dez. 2021 um 14:04 Uhr schrieb Nikhil Ladha :
> Hi Michael
>
> I think you are hitting a similar issue like this one
> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/3066.
> If so, the fix for the same is under review and could be available in the
> next release.
>
Thanks for your reply.
Hey Marco,
>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 4:07 AM Marco Fais wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> is the online upgrade from 9.x to 10.0 supported?
>>>
>>> ...
>
>>> Trying to restart the upgraded glusterd node doesn't help. I have also
>>> tried to clean up /var/lib/glusterd without success.
>>>
>>> Am I
Hi Michael
I think you are hitting a similar issue like this one
https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/3066.
If so, the fix for the same is under review and could be available in the
next release.
--
Thanks and Regards,
*NiKHIL LADHA*
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 6:25 PM Michael Böhm
wrote:
Hey guys,
i have a problem upgrading our nodes from 8.3 to 10.0 - i just upgraded the
first node and run into "the cksums mismatch" problem. On the upgraded v10
node the checksums for all volumes are different than on the other v8
nodes. That leads to the node starting in a peer rejected state. I
