[Gluster-users] Behaviour of simple distributed volumes on failed bricks?

I had a question on the expected behaviour of simple distributed volumes when a brick fails for the following scenarios (as in, will the scenario succeed for fail) : - New file creation if that file name hashes to the failed brick - New file creation if that file name hashes to one of the remainin

Re: [Gluster-users] Issue when upgrading from 3.6 to 3.7

issue, please revert us > back with the logs. > > -- > Regards, > Manikandan Selvaganesh. > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Manikandan Selvaganesh < > mselv...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi Ram, >> >> Apologies. I was stuck on something else. I will up

Re: [Gluster-users] Issue when upgrading from 3.6 to 3.7

quota would not work properly. This quota-version > is introduced recently which adds suffix to the quota related extended > attributes. > > On Jul 25, 2016 6:36 PM, "B.K.Raghuram" wrote: > >> Manikandan, >> >> We just overwrote the setup with a fresh install an

Re: [Gluster-users] Help needed in debugging a glusted-vol.log file..

ou > are willing to turn on bind-insecure option, then I do see this problem > going away. > > P.S : This option is been turned on by default in 3.7. > > ~Atin > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > >> Will have a look at the logs

Re: [Gluster-users] Issue when upgrading from 3.6 to 3.7

ul 25, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:37 PM, B.K.Raghuram wrote: >> >>> Atin, >>> >>> Couple of quick questions about the upgrade and in general about the >>> meaning of some of the p

Re: [Gluster-users] Issue when upgrading from 3.6 to 3.7

sulted in a checksum mismatch resulting into > peer rejection. But we can confirm it from log files and respective info > file content. > > > On Saturday 23 July 2016, B.K.Raghuram wrote: > >> Unfortunately, the setup is at a customer's place which is not remotely &g

Re: [Gluster-users] Help needed in debugging a glusted-vol.log file..

blem > going away. > > P.S : This option is been turned on by default in 3.7. > > ~Atin > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > >> Will have a look at the logs tomorrow. >> >> >> On Sunday 24 July 2016, B.K.Raghuram wrote:

Re: [Gluster-users] Issue when upgrading from 3.6 to 3.7

> > > On Friday 22 July 2016, B.K.Raghuram wrote: > >> When we upgrade some nodes from 3.6.1 to 3.7.13, some of the nodes give a >> peer status of "peer rejected" while some dont. Is there a reason for this >> discrepency and will the steps mentioned in &g

[Gluster-users] Issue when upgrading from 3.6 to 3.7

When we upgrade some nodes from 3.6.1 to 3.7.13, some of the nodes give a peer status of "peer rejected" while some dont. Is there a reason for this discrepency and will the steps mentioned in http://gluster-documentations.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Resolving%20Peer%20Rejected/

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Non Shared Persistent Gluster Storage with Kubernetes

I have not gone through this implementation nor the new iscsi implementation being worked on for 3.9 but I thought I'd share the design behind a distributed iscsi implementation that we'd worked on some time back based on the istgt code with a libgfapi hook. The implementation used the idea of usi

[Gluster-users] Which version supports extended acls?

This is probably a naive question but could I know from which version onwards was support for extended ACLs supported? Specifically, I wanted to know from which version would all setfacl/getfacl commands work as expected. Also, a broader question emnating from this is would it be useful for a fea

Re: [Gluster-users] Problem with glusterd locks on gluster 3.6.1

n June 16, 2016 1:02:24 AM PDT, "B.K.Raghuram" wrote: > >> Thanks a lot Atin, >> >> The problem is that we are using a forked version of 3.6.1 which has been >> modified to work with ZFS (for snapshots) but we do not have the resources >> to port that ov

Re: [Gluster-users] Problem with glusterd locks on gluster 3.6.1

I'd tried that sometime back but ran into some merge conflicts and was not sure who to turn to :) May I come to you for help with that?! On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On 06/17/2016 03:21 PM, B.K.Raghuram wrote: > > Thanks a ton Atin. That fix

Re: [Gluster-users] Problem with glusterd locks on gluster 3.6.1

:07 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > I've resolved the merge conflicts and files are attached. Copy these > files and follow the instructions from the cherry pick command which > failed. > > ~Atin > > On 06/17/2016 02:55 PM, B.K.Raghuram wrote: > > > > Thanks At

Re: [Gluster-users] Problem with glusterd locks on gluster 3.6.1

Thanks Atin.. I'm not familiar with pulling patches the review system but will try:) On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On 06/16/2016 06:17 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > > > > On 06/16/2016 01:32 PM, B.K.Raghuram wrote: > >>

Re: [Gluster-users] Problem with glusterd locks on gluster 3.6.1

, -Ram On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On 06/16/2016 10:49 AM, B.K.Raghuram wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Atin Mukherjee > <mailto:amukh...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > &g

Re: [Gluster-users] Problem with glusterd locks on gluster 3.6.1

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On 06/15/2016 04:24 PM, B.K.Raghuram wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We're using gluster 3.6.1 and we periodically find that gluster commands > > fail saying the it could not get the lock on one of th

[Gluster-users] Problem with glusterd locks on gluster 3.6.1

Hi, We're using gluster 3.6.1 and we periodically find that gluster commands fail saying the it could not get the lock on one of the brick machines. The logs on that machine then say something like : [2016-06-15 08:17:03.076119] E [glusterd-op-sm.c:3058:glusterd_op_ac_lock] 0-management: Unable t

[Gluster-users] "Official" word on gluster replace brick for 3.6?

I just wanted to check if gluster replace brick commit force is "officially" deprecated in 3.6? Is there any other way to do a planned replace of just one of the bricks in a replica pair? Add/remove brick requires that new bricks be added in replica count multiples which may not be always available

[Gluster-users] How can i replace died hard disk (a brick) with new hard disk (new brick).

Had come across this suggestion in sometime back. Is this a valid way to go about replacing a brick or is it not safe? http://blog.dave.vc/2013/08/replacing-lost-brick-in-gluster.html ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://superc

Re: [Gluster-users] Cluster locked?

How does one figure out which node is holding the lock? A restart of glusterd on all the nodes in the pool did not seem to resolve the problem. On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On 05/16/2014 12:24 PM, B.K.Raghuram wrote: > >> A hard accidental power down of o

[Gluster-users] Cluster locked?

A hard accidental power down of our boxes now results in the message "Another transaction could be in progress. Please try again after sometime." for most volume operations. I'm presuming this is the result of some sort of cluster lock. How does one get around the problem? Where are such lock files

[Gluster-users] Question on libgfapi python when used within an application server conext..

I'm trying to use the libgfapi python bindings to write a django app that can traverse a gluster volume. The script seems to work fine when run from a command line but seg faults when run from within django. Would anyone know why? Also, there seems to be no neat way to differentiate between a dire

[Gluster-users] No winbindd in latest samba rpms on the gluster page

Just pulled down the the latest rpms from http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/samba/ and post install, it does not seem to have the winbindd which is needed for ad authentication. Could these be packaged in as well? ___ Gluster-users mailing

[Gluster-users] Problem creating/editing files with samba gluster vfs module..

Hi, We have built samba 4.1 from source with the gluster vfs module enabled. I am able to access (read) and browse a volume from a windows machine. However, when I try to create or edit a file that resides on the volume from a windows box, it hangs forever. On the backend, I see that many temporar

[Gluster-users] Semantics of opRet and opErrno

Is there any documentation on the semantics of these return values for common gluster commands? If not, is there a common guideline on how to interpret these values? Thanks in advance.. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supe

[Gluster-users] remove-brick very slow for (distributed-)replicated volumes?

We have a gigabit ethernet lan on which there is no other traffic and I am getting the following numbers when I do a remove-brick. The sequence of steps is that I create a 2 way replicated volume, populate it with 300 files totalling 100MB. I then add a pair of bricks to the volume and then a remov

[Gluster-users] Re; Strange behaviour with add-brick followed by remove-brick

Here are the steps that I did to reproduce the problem. Essentially, if you try to remove a brick that is not the same as the localhost then it seems to migrate the files on the localhost brick instead and hence there is a lot of data loss.. If instead, I try to remove the localhost brick, it works

[Gluster-users] Strange behaviour with add-brick followed by remove-brick

I have gluster 3.4.1 on 4 boxes with hostnames n9, n10, n11, n12. I did the following sequence of steps and ended up with losing data so what did I do wrong?! - Create a distributed volume with bricks on n9 and n10 - Started the volume - NFS mounted the volume and created 100 files on it. Found th

[Gluster-users] Recommended brick replacement methods?

Hi, Given the recent threads about remove-brick vs replace brick, I was wondering if someone could throw some light on the best ways to handle each of the following situations where each brick/volume could contain large amounts of data: In all these cases, the new brick will have a different host

[Gluster-users] Peer list question

I am trying to get the list of peers in the pool using the --xml output of the gluster peer status command. I would like to get the list of the current host where the command is being run as well, if it is part of the pool. Is there any way of doing this? Since gluster peer status does not give me

[Gluster-users] volume sizeFree & sizeTotal - for brick for whole volume?

Hi, Just wanted to know if the sizeTotal and sizeFree figures returned by gluster volume status represent data for the individual bricks or for the whole volume. The reason for the doubt is that it is returned in the level in the xml output. Also, there is a 1 in the node level. What does this r

[Gluster-users] Best practices link?

For someone who is implementing gluster for the first time, is there a list of best practices for common scenarios? For eg. what are the series of steps to be done if one is noticing that a node is starting to fail or what does one do to add new storage capacity to a volume? While the admin guide l

[Gluster-users] Getting replica count from a script?

Hi, I would like to get the replica or stripe count of a volume from a script. Is there a command to get this info without having to parse the output of the volume info command? Or can I parse through a config file somewhere to get this? Thanks, -Ram __