On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
Thank you for your answer Melkor.
>
You're welcome!
> This is the kind of experience I was looking for actually. I am happy that
> it has worked fine for you.
>
> Anybody coming across any issues while reading directly from the
> underlyin
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
> > socket.c:2915
> > > priv->ssl_meth = (SSL_METHOD *)TLSv1_method();
> >
> > I'm really glad to hear that :-)
>
>
> FWIW, using TLSv1_2_method instead doesn't immediately seem to break.
> Unfortunately, every possible piece of code for 3.7 got
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
> The problem with Gluster setting is that's impossible to go above
> >
> > HIGH:!SSLv2:!3DES:!RC4:!aNULL:!ADH
> >
> > Which is bad.. Gluster uses SSL only and not TLS :-( An upgrade should be
> > considered.
>
> That is untrue in current code:
>
Hi,
Now that I got SSL running properly I wanted to fiddle a bit with it,
namely its cipher-list and there's something that if not good IMHO.
SSLv2 is obsolete and dangerous but SSLv3 is also largely deprecated, even
the first versions of TLS are deprecated.
A strict minimum for a cipher-list sh
Hi,
To my understanding, Gluster starts volumes TCP services at port 49152 and
then increases the port number with every new volume right? I have a 3
replica test environment with only one volume "TEST"
This is what I expected :
server0 : glusterd 24007 + glusterfsd 49152
server1 : glusterd 2400
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Joe Julian wrote:
>
>
>
> https://github.com/GlusterFS/glusterfs/blob/master/doc/admin-guide/en-US/markdown/admin_ssl.md
>
Small note to tell that I got SSL working properly as I wanted, thanks :-)
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly, it's just selective about who its
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
>
>
> *Can I directly access the data on the underlying storage volumes?*
>>
>> If you are just doing just read()/access()/stat() like operations, you
>> should be fine. If you are not using any new features (like
>> quota/geo-replication etc
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
The result is available at [1]. This does not include all .md files, has
> some issues in rendering a few images and the documentation flow is not the
> best, but it possibly seems much better than whatever we have right now.
>
> [1]
> http://e
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Joe Julian wrote:
I'll split this out as I think you're unaware of the admin guide that's
> pretty detailed and is, at least, published with the source code (it may be
> on the gluster.org site somewhere, but I'm too tired right now to look).
> The source can read
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Joe Julian wrote:
>
> I'll just address this one point in this email because it's such an
> important one. This is not just an open-source project because some
> company's developing a product and lets you have it for free, this is an
> open-source *project*. We,
Hi,
I've been playing with GlusterFS to test it and I'm quite happy with it for
now except few issues I'll describe here.
I'm running a 3 replica system at work (Ubuntu 14.04 with latest GlusterFS
release from PPA) to make sure some data can not vanish in case of hardware
failure. They are mounte
11 matches
Mail list logo
