Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS absolute max. storage size in total?

if we go with 36*10(360)per node. Planned 360TB per node is far from recommended 64TB. We are using Glusterfs with disperse volume for video archival. Regards K. Mohamed Pakkeer On 20-Apr-2017 9:00 AM, "Amar Tumballi" <atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 at

Re: [Gluster-users] Speed up heal performance

Hi Pranith, Will this patch improve the heal performance on distributed disperse volume?. Currently we are getting 10MB/s heal performance on 10G backed network. SHD daemon takes 5 days to complete the heal operation for single 4TB( 3.5 TB data) disk failure. Regards, Backer On Wed, Oct 14,

Re: [Gluster-users] cluster.min-free-disk is not working in distributed disperse volume

inline. - Original Message - From: Mohamed Pakkeer mdfakk...@gmail.com To: Susant Palai spa...@redhat.com Cc: Mathieu Chateau mathieu.chat...@lotp.fr, gluster-users gluster-users@gluster.org, Gluster Devel gluster-de...@gluster.org, Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com, Pranith Kumar

Re: [Gluster-users] cluster.min-free-disk is not working in distributed disperse volume

. ++Ccing Pranith and Ashish to detail on disperse behaviour. - Original Message - From: Mohamed Pakkeer mdfakk...@gmail.com To: Susant Palai spa...@redhat.com, Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com Cc: Mathieu Chateau mathieu.chat...@lotp.fr, gluster-users gluster-users@gluster.org, Gluster

Re: [Gluster-users] cluster.min-free-disk is not working in distributed disperse volume

, Will investigate in to weighted rebalance behavior. Susant - Original Message - From: Mohamed Pakkeer mdfakk...@gmail.com To: Susant Palai spa...@redhat.com Cc: Mathieu Chateau mathieu.chat...@lotp.fr, gluster-users gluster-users@gluster.org, Gluster Devel gluster-de...@gluster.org Sent

Re: [Gluster-users] cluster.min-free-disk is not working in distributed disperse volume

Chateau mathieu.chat...@lotp.fr To: Mohamed Pakkeer mdfakk...@gmail.com Cc: gluster-users gluster-users@gluster.org, Gluster Devel gluster-de...@gluster.org Sent: Monday, 24 August, 2015 2:47:00 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] cluster.min-free-disk is not working in distributed disperse

[Gluster-users] cluster.min-free-disk is not working in distributed disperse volume

Hi, I have a cluster of 720 bricks, all bricks are 4TB in size. I have change the cluster.min-free-disk default value 10% to 3%. So all the disks should have 3% minimum disk space free. But some cluster disks are getting full now. Is there any additional configuration for keeping some

Re: [Gluster-users] cluster.min-free-disk is not working in distributed disperse volume

at 4:28 PM, Mohamed Pakkeer mdfakk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Susant, Thanks for your quick reply. We are not updating any files. Actually we are archiving video files on this cluster. I think there is a bug in cluster.min-free-disk. Also i would like to know about rebalance the cluster

[Gluster-users] Replace a failed disk in Distributed Disperse Volume

Hi Gluster Experts, How to replace the failed disk on the same mount point in distributed disperse volume? I am following the below steps to replace the disk. 1. Kill the PID of the failed disk 2. unmount the drive 3. insert , format and mount the new drive on the same failed drive mount point

[Gluster-users] Replace a failed disk in disperse volume

Hi Gluster Experts, How to replace the failed disk on the same mount point in distributed disperse volume? I am following the below steps to replace the disk. 1. Kill the PID of the failed disk 2. unmount the drive 3. insert , format and mount the new drive on the same failed drive mount point

Re: [Gluster-users] Issue with Pro active self healing for Erasure coding

-time120 features.cache-invalidation off features.cache-invalidation-timeout 60 Thanks regards Backer On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Xavier Hernandez xhernan...@datalab.es wrote: On 06/15/2015 09:25 AM, Mohamed Pakkeer wrote: Hi Xavier, When can we

Re: [Gluster-users] Issue with Pro active self healing for Erasure coding

/27/2015 11:26 AM, Mohamed Pakkeer wrote: Hi Xavier, Thanks for your reply. When can we expect the 3.7.1 release? AFAIK a beta of 3.7.1 will be released very soon. cheers Backer On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Xavier Hernandez xhernan...@datalab.es mailto:xhernan...@datalab.es wrote

Re: [Gluster-users] Issue with Pro active self healing for Erasure coding

/2015 10:15 AM, Mohamed Pakkeer wrote: Hi Glusterfs Experts, We are testing glusterfs 3.7.0 tarball on our 10 Node glusterfs cluster. Each node has 36 dirves and please find the volume info below Volume Name: vaulttest5 Type: Distributed-Disperse Volume ID: 68e082a6-9819-4885-856c

[Gluster-users] Issue with Pro active self healing for Erasure coding

Hi Glusterfs Experts, We are testing glusterfs 3.7.0 tarball on our 10 Node glusterfs cluster. Each node has 36 dirves and please find the volume info below Volume Name: vaulttest5 Type: Distributed-Disperse Volume ID: 68e082a6-9819-4885-856c-1510cd201bd9 Status: Started Number of Bricks: 36 x

[Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.7 Compile Error

Hi GlusterFS experts, I am trying to compile GlusterFS 3.7 on Ubuntu 14.04 and getting following error checking sys/acl.h usability... no checking sys/acl.h presence... no checking for sys/acl.h... no configure: error: Support for POSIX ACLs is required node001:~/glusterfs-3.7.0$ Ubuntu 14.04

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.7 Compile Error

It is working. Thanks Kaleb Regards Backer On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com wrote: On 05/19/2015 10:17 AM, Mohamed Pakkeer wrote: Hi GlusterFS experts, I am trying to compile GlusterFS 3.7 on Ubuntu 14.04 and getting following error checking sys/acl.h

[Gluster-users] GlusterFS Dispersed Volume

Hi Glusterfs experts, I am very new to GlusterFS. We are planning to create disperse volume on 36 drives chassis node. I have a question about dispersed volume. Can we configure the dispersed volume fail over at the node level instead of brick level?. If i have 36 drives in a machine and