Thanks Vijay, will take a look and report back.
On 07.05.2015 12:06, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 05/07/2015 12:03 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 6. Mai 2015, 23:34:31 schrieb Oliver:
Hi gluster users,
I have a few questions about monitoring and statistics.
We are about to
stats in our graphite setup, I
already saw diamond-collectors for ceph, does anyone know about similar
things for gluster ?
thanks in advance,
Oliver
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster
stats in our graphite setup, I
already saw diamond-collectors for ceph, does anyone know about similar
things for gluster ?
thanks in advance,
Oliver
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster
in 1
command ? How would it work in the future when I gets to production
machines with each 2 or even more disks ?
Were great someone could gimme a hint.
Its gluster 3.4.2-1ubuntu1 amd64 on ubuntu 14.04 LTS.
regards, Oliver
___
Gluster-users mailing
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 02:03:47 +0300
Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> The question is a fundamental for understanding storage and not 100%
> about GlusterFS but I fell like it's the right place to ask it.
>
> I am trying to understand CPU cycles vs IOPS.
> Per each IO There must be a number of cycles of
Hi,
I switched eth1 and eth0. Now the internal communication has 1Gbit. I
ran the test again and now it took 3:30 instead of 8:something. Quite
better but still not good though.
Next I'll put the whole setup on recent HW.
Oliver
> Hi all,
>
> I read the posting from Jeremy an
cking it.
Even if I have new and fast servers with 1Gbit or better 10Gbit ethernet
for glusterfs I fear that the performance is still too poor. At least if
it comes to reading/writing lots of tiny files from lots of clients.
Mail- or db-servers come to mind.
What do you think?
Regards,
O
wrote:
I've just done part one of a writeup of my EC2 gluster LAMP
installation
at
http://www.sirgroane.net/2010/03/distributed-file-system-on-amazon-ec2/
- may or may not be useful to you :-)
Ian
On 24/03/2010 17:09, Oliver Hoffmann wrote:
Yes, that's
.
>
> http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/glusterfs
>
> But then 10.04 is only a month away, so depends how much of a rush
> your in!
>
>
>
> On Wednesday 24 Mar 2010 16:45:40 Oliver Hoffmann wrote:
> > Haha, there are loads of Linux distributions out there and even
> &g
s.
Cheers!
> On 22/03/2010 17:59, Oliver Hoffmann wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just made some tests on two old machines using Ubuntu 10.4 (server
> > i386) with fuse-2.7.4glfs11 and glusterfs-3.0.3. At a first glance
> > it seems to be OK.
> > The next s
t; On 03/22/2010 06:59 PM, Oliver Hoffmann wrote:
>
> > The next step is deploying a system which could be used for
> > production. What would you suggest? Ubuntu 10.4 (server 64bit) is my
> > first choice because of LTS. Whatsoever, I think it is more the
> > version of
lol, and we have nothing to do with the cathedral or Dom Koelsch either.
But having DomUs on glusterfs would be nice though, if possible.
Greetings,
Oliver
> off topic ..
>
> Just happened to look at your website, in the hope it had something
> to do with virtualization ( DomU :-)
first choice because of LTS. Whatsoever, I think it is more the version
of glusterfs which makes it stable or not, isn't it?
In the end I'd like to have a distributed & replicated storage which
provides data for a bunch of (virtualized) LAMPS.
TIA for your recommendations!
Regards,
O
Hi all,
question answered by searching the list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gluster-users@gluster.org/msg02299.html
Regards,
Oliver Hoffmann
> Hi list,
>
> I used zfs on FreeBSD 8.0 for a while now which is just fine. The
> next step would be to combine it with gluste
2.x?
Apart from that Linux plus zfs is not what I want but opensolaris might
be an option. Should I consider this and drop FreeBSD?
Regards,
Oliver Hoffmann
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
15 matches
Mail list logo
